Accept? Why should any one "accept" anything without good reason?
None. It goes against my common sense. That is why I am asking what accuracy can this method give. I am asking that to people who are already seemingly convinced that the methods listed (fossil records, ice-cores) can…
See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees? Also share if this accuracy requires any…
But those are unreliable as well... See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees?
>What’s the point of scanning function by function, line by line? Because a critical bug could be anywhere, even in a simple function. Particularly when it is written by an LLM. Who knows when it chooses to have a bad…
>For complex code changes or bigger features I often spend hours with an LLM refining architecture The problem here is that the LLM hallucinates, so * it will tell that something is a bad idea, even when it is not. * it…
It is not really surprising that skeptics exist when the answers they get are of these sort...
>Past precipitation can be used to reconstruct past palaeoclimatic temperatures. δD and δ18O is related to surface temperature at middle and high latitudes. The relationship is consistent and linear over…
>historic CO2 levels -> historic average global temps But this seems to imply that global temperatures are only dependent on CO2 levels. That is a pretty flawed assumption...
>AI is the continuation of the computer revolution. Yes, it is a vastly efficient search technique using fast computers.
Not really. I only reject using them for certain things that require vastly more reliable data. And I am not making the mistake of relying on unreliable data just because it is the best we can manage. Also why don't you…
That does not look very reliable to me, because that implies certain things are only affected by ambient temperature. Btw, Can you tell me how ancient temperature is measured from ice cores? My lookup only says we can…
But there is no way to confirm that those methods are accurate...
Don't worry. A lot of people were captivated by computers and programming before it ever became profitable. A lot of them will continue to be, even after it does not pay well..
>Keyboards require learning We are not talking about keyboard shortcuts (key combinations that you press to do something) by the way, and about the actual typing of commands in the terminal/shell/repl what ever...
>Your "flow" is just habits, things you've taught yourself to do By this logic a person who were comfortable with mouse should never grow to like VIM. > there is no "natural" or "intuitive" way to operate a computer.…
> do better than state slavery. The point is the exploitation of the masses and the ensuing concentration of wealth is the enabler. Sure we might find a way to do that without Ads...
I hate ads of all kinds and I hate targeted manipulations of all kinds. But that does not stop me from recognizing the part it plays in the world. That shouldn't stop you either. > we wouldn't have charities, freedom of…
Not sure what you find funny about it. >Those ancient wonders were enabled by slave labor That is exactly the point.
Advertisements actually run the world. Imagine a world without ads. The economy would grind to a halt. It is exploitation and manipulation, but that enables creation of large capital, which leads to great things. In the…
And thank you for demonstrating mine..
> to detect an effect significantly stronger than most drugs.. What the heck are you smokin? Did paracetamol have a weaker affect on temperature than smoking causing cancer?
>because that information is indistinguishable from noise. Not if the signal is strong. Whether a thing works or not, is a pretty strong signal. Your equating it to bad effects of smoking is flawed and is not…
>I am clearly talking about both positive and negative effects of drugs. Then you are answering to a point that was not raised. > most lovely features in an environment of complete information, which this is not. The…
Not sure, I was just talking about the efficacy, not long term side effects. The parent comment was also talking about showing efficacy... >Literally one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. It is capitalism 101. Not…
Accept? Why should any one "accept" anything without good reason?
None. It goes against my common sense. That is why I am asking what accuracy can this method give. I am asking that to people who are already seemingly convinced that the methods listed (fossil records, ice-cores) can…
See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees? Also share if this accuracy requires any…
But those are unreliable as well... See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees?
>What’s the point of scanning function by function, line by line? Because a critical bug could be anywhere, even in a simple function. Particularly when it is written by an LLM. Who knows when it chooses to have a bad…
>For complex code changes or bigger features I often spend hours with an LLM refining architecture The problem here is that the LLM hallucinates, so * it will tell that something is a bad idea, even when it is not. * it…
It is not really surprising that skeptics exist when the answers they get are of these sort...
>Past precipitation can be used to reconstruct past palaeoclimatic temperatures. δD and δ18O is related to surface temperature at middle and high latitudes. The relationship is consistent and linear over…
>historic CO2 levels -> historic average global temps But this seems to imply that global temperatures are only dependent on CO2 levels. That is a pretty flawed assumption...
>AI is the continuation of the computer revolution. Yes, it is a vastly efficient search technique using fast computers.
Not really. I only reject using them for certain things that require vastly more reliable data. And I am not making the mistake of relying on unreliable data just because it is the best we can manage. Also why don't you…
That does not look very reliable to me, because that implies certain things are only affected by ambient temperature. Btw, Can you tell me how ancient temperature is measured from ice cores? My lookup only says we can…
But there is no way to confirm that those methods are accurate...
Don't worry. A lot of people were captivated by computers and programming before it ever became profitable. A lot of them will continue to be, even after it does not pay well..
>Keyboards require learning We are not talking about keyboard shortcuts (key combinations that you press to do something) by the way, and about the actual typing of commands in the terminal/shell/repl what ever...
>Your "flow" is just habits, things you've taught yourself to do By this logic a person who were comfortable with mouse should never grow to like VIM. > there is no "natural" or "intuitive" way to operate a computer.…
> do better than state slavery. The point is the exploitation of the masses and the ensuing concentration of wealth is the enabler. Sure we might find a way to do that without Ads...
I hate ads of all kinds and I hate targeted manipulations of all kinds. But that does not stop me from recognizing the part it plays in the world. That shouldn't stop you either. > we wouldn't have charities, freedom of…
Not sure what you find funny about it. >Those ancient wonders were enabled by slave labor That is exactly the point.
Advertisements actually run the world. Imagine a world without ads. The economy would grind to a halt. It is exploitation and manipulation, but that enables creation of large capital, which leads to great things. In the…
And thank you for demonstrating mine..
> to detect an effect significantly stronger than most drugs.. What the heck are you smokin? Did paracetamol have a weaker affect on temperature than smoking causing cancer?
>because that information is indistinguishable from noise. Not if the signal is strong. Whether a thing works or not, is a pretty strong signal. Your equating it to bad effects of smoking is flawed and is not…
>I am clearly talking about both positive and negative effects of drugs. Then you are answering to a point that was not raised. > most lovely features in an environment of complete information, which this is not. The…
Not sure, I was just talking about the efficacy, not long term side effects. The parent comment was also talking about showing efficacy... >Literally one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. It is capitalism 101. Not…