Safari on my MacBook Air opened it fine, though it took about four seconds. Zooming works fine as well. It does take ~3GB of memory according to Activity Monitor.
I grew up on a farm and I used to love reading through Farm Show magazine to see all the DIY inventions the other farmers would come up with. I just checked and it looks like it's still published though there's not much…
It isn't. But if you move straight to 7nm you only need to recoup the costs for 7nm, not 10nm + 7nm.
I agree. It confused me when I first started looking at patents but the accepted usage in patent law is that it is open-ended and can include other non-mentioned elements.
I agree that it's the opposite of standard usage but that's how it's interpreted in patent language. Here's a quote straight from the USPTO website: "The transitional term “comprising”, which is synonymous with…
Do you remember the specific cases? I'd be interested in knowing the details of these rulings. If you look at the Garrod Glossaries you'll find several examples of the "open-ended" claim construction for comprising.
"Comprises" is a term that has a specific usage in patents. Comprises means that at least all of the listed elements must exist but other elements that are not mentioned in the claim may also be present. The alternative…
Safari on my MacBook Air opened it fine, though it took about four seconds. Zooming works fine as well. It does take ~3GB of memory according to Activity Monitor.
I grew up on a farm and I used to love reading through Farm Show magazine to see all the DIY inventions the other farmers would come up with. I just checked and it looks like it's still published though there's not much…
It isn't. But if you move straight to 7nm you only need to recoup the costs for 7nm, not 10nm + 7nm.
I agree. It confused me when I first started looking at patents but the accepted usage in patent law is that it is open-ended and can include other non-mentioned elements.
I agree that it's the opposite of standard usage but that's how it's interpreted in patent language. Here's a quote straight from the USPTO website: "The transitional term “comprising”, which is synonymous with…
Do you remember the specific cases? I'd be interested in knowing the details of these rulings. If you look at the Garrod Glossaries you'll find several examples of the "open-ended" claim construction for comprising.
"Comprises" is a term that has a specific usage in patents. Comprises means that at least all of the listed elements must exist but other elements that are not mentioned in the claim may also be present. The alternative…