What part of funded and operated by the US GOV is hard to understand?
Starshield which is operated and funded by the US GOV. Some of you really need to touch some grass if you think military war technology is not controlled by the US GOV.
As if SpaceX is not?
And where does it say this was SpaceX decision? Seems highly unlikely to me. Starshield is litteraly a US gov project which this is about. Not the public network at all. The title is clickbait honestly.
Musk has been pretty vocal. Past controversy was literally the government asking him to do something illegal. Starshield is starlink for the US military. I highly doubt this controversy is anything other than SpaceX…
The guy who built it should not be running it because it is too important?
You really think they do something other than what the US gov tells them?
The more intelligent someone is, can just lead to more creative ways to go crazy.
Corruption is objectively negative. The east indian company not generating wealth is objectively wrong. The roman and british empires were not the same and the roman one required way more war to maintain.
Sure but if the results have practical implications then the validity will be self evident. If they do not, not much of consequence has been lost. Interesting that math gets so much attention, when actual advances to…
1. War costs wealth not empires by themselves. GB created an empire, because their technological and intelligence advantage was so high, the amount of war needed to get it was small. By intelligence I mean the…
Missing the forest for the trees. Spain had extreme wealth from colonies, but wasted it on nothing but debauchery. Britain had wealth from colonies and maintained an empire with very few people and no computers. The…
Yes the AI investment bond market is so large it is literally competing with the government.
Farage was debanked. So was Trump and Melania, AfD politicians, Le Penn in france.
Outside the US, NATO countries have very little power projection capabilities. A bit of france, a bit of UK and then nothing.
The EU is entirely subjugated to the US. No energy independence, militaries falling apart and out of date, no tech development or investment.
ICC judges getting the right wing activist treatment, except the activists get it from their own government.
> And while the wealthy always threaten to leave when faced with higher taxes, the fact is that they never seem to actually do so. Around 2T worth of wealthy individuals left california when the wealth tax propositon…
No california has an NGO homeless industry, which gets paid on the amount of homelessness. They are incentivised on increasing homelessness, thus this is what they do.
Nice straw man you have there.
And the border communities loved having them there and invited them? Everything I said was factual. The voters of those northern communities love supporting policies as long as they happen someplace else. A thing called…
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/16/migrants-marthas-vi... They were of course removed from the community swiftly.
The ECHR is actually very loose with their definitions. The UK chooses to interpret and enforce them as they do. Other european countries are within ECHR limits and deal with it entirely differently.
Because the UK wants them. They can stop the boats at any time. They can stop feeding and housing them at any time. They come because the UK government and NGOs provide them with a comfortable life.
Much like the residents of Martha's Vinyard, I am sure all have been very progressive, until it was time to have migrants in their back yards.
What part of funded and operated by the US GOV is hard to understand?
Starshield which is operated and funded by the US GOV. Some of you really need to touch some grass if you think military war technology is not controlled by the US GOV.
As if SpaceX is not?
And where does it say this was SpaceX decision? Seems highly unlikely to me. Starshield is litteraly a US gov project which this is about. Not the public network at all. The title is clickbait honestly.
Musk has been pretty vocal. Past controversy was literally the government asking him to do something illegal. Starshield is starlink for the US military. I highly doubt this controversy is anything other than SpaceX…
The guy who built it should not be running it because it is too important?
You really think they do something other than what the US gov tells them?
The more intelligent someone is, can just lead to more creative ways to go crazy.
Corruption is objectively negative. The east indian company not generating wealth is objectively wrong. The roman and british empires were not the same and the roman one required way more war to maintain.
Sure but if the results have practical implications then the validity will be self evident. If they do not, not much of consequence has been lost. Interesting that math gets so much attention, when actual advances to…
1. War costs wealth not empires by themselves. GB created an empire, because their technological and intelligence advantage was so high, the amount of war needed to get it was small. By intelligence I mean the…
Missing the forest for the trees. Spain had extreme wealth from colonies, but wasted it on nothing but debauchery. Britain had wealth from colonies and maintained an empire with very few people and no computers. The…
Yes the AI investment bond market is so large it is literally competing with the government.
Farage was debanked. So was Trump and Melania, AfD politicians, Le Penn in france.
Outside the US, NATO countries have very little power projection capabilities. A bit of france, a bit of UK and then nothing.
The EU is entirely subjugated to the US. No energy independence, militaries falling apart and out of date, no tech development or investment.
ICC judges getting the right wing activist treatment, except the activists get it from their own government.
> And while the wealthy always threaten to leave when faced with higher taxes, the fact is that they never seem to actually do so. Around 2T worth of wealthy individuals left california when the wealth tax propositon…
No california has an NGO homeless industry, which gets paid on the amount of homelessness. They are incentivised on increasing homelessness, thus this is what they do.
Nice straw man you have there.
And the border communities loved having them there and invited them? Everything I said was factual. The voters of those northern communities love supporting policies as long as they happen someplace else. A thing called…
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/16/migrants-marthas-vi... They were of course removed from the community swiftly.
The ECHR is actually very loose with their definitions. The UK chooses to interpret and enforce them as they do. Other european countries are within ECHR limits and deal with it entirely differently.
Because the UK wants them. They can stop the boats at any time. They can stop feeding and housing them at any time. They come because the UK government and NGOs provide them with a comfortable life.
Much like the residents of Martha's Vinyard, I am sure all have been very progressive, until it was time to have migrants in their back yards.