thanks. let's refashion our cityscape and our clothing to accommodate self driving cars. don't care about pedestrians. </sarcasm>
lol reminds me of https://www.amazon.com/101-Unuseless-Japanese-Inventions-Chi...
I was enjoying the beginning of this article so I wanted to save it as a PDF for review later when I would be off-grid BUT NOEP CANNOT so goodbye
https://what-if.xkcd.com/28/
"Like many others, I too rediscovered the power of pure GNU Make" ... wait a sec, GNU make is not "pure!" I like it but I recognize that it has features that a more portable make would not have.
also there a lot of implementations of "pointer/size/capacity struct" for strings in plain C
yes everyone needs a 1.25 hour commute to work
> PuTTY ... but it’s… not good, at all. Pls explain.
Hmm, man section 4: "devices and device drivers?" I guess that is part of the joke. But I suggest move this to section 7 so maybe it can survive there for a few years.
You read my mind. Thanks
thanks. let's refashion our cityscape and our clothing to accommodate self driving cars. don't care about pedestrians. </sarcasm>
lol reminds me of https://www.amazon.com/101-Unuseless-Japanese-Inventions-Chi...
I was enjoying the beginning of this article so I wanted to save it as a PDF for review later when I would be off-grid BUT NOEP CANNOT so goodbye
https://what-if.xkcd.com/28/
"Like many others, I too rediscovered the power of pure GNU Make" ... wait a sec, GNU make is not "pure!" I like it but I recognize that it has features that a more portable make would not have.
also there a lot of implementations of "pointer/size/capacity struct" for strings in plain C
yes everyone needs a 1.25 hour commute to work
> PuTTY ... but it’s… not good, at all. Pls explain.
Hmm, man section 4: "devices and device drivers?" I guess that is part of the joke. But I suggest move this to section 7 so maybe it can survive there for a few years.
You read my mind. Thanks