I'll add that even though the pay rates were nominally quoted per hour, under Leapforce, it was really task-based because they wouldn't pay more than AET. I know raters had their invoices rejected if their productivity…
There were different time allotments per task, yes. In the Raterhub era, each task had an "Average Estimated Time" (AET) set by Google. A typical 5x5 side-by-side search result comparison task would have been 9 minutes,…
AOL got in hot water for this. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program
Former longtime Leapforce/RaterLabs preferred/senior rater here. There was always some exploitation going on, but it got way worse under Ruth Porat's tenure. Standard Leapforce US English raters were paid $13.50/hr. If…
I'll add that even though the pay rates were nominally quoted per hour, under Leapforce, it was really task-based because they wouldn't pay more than AET. I know raters had their invoices rejected if their productivity…
There were different time allotments per task, yes. In the Raterhub era, each task had an "Average Estimated Time" (AET) set by Google. A typical 5x5 side-by-side search result comparison task would have been 9 minutes,…
AOL got in hot water for this. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program
Former longtime Leapforce/RaterLabs preferred/senior rater here. There was always some exploitation going on, but it got way worse under Ruth Porat's tenure. Standard Leapforce US English raters were paid $13.50/hr. If…