Why not just remove ego from humanity?
Have both of you considered taking with less ego?
Someone could judge the original poster for not saying "Mandelbrot". In turn, the original poster can judge whoever discovered it for wanting to put a name to pure math. That is the cycle of judgement. Without ego, I…
If you had no ego, you would just say Mandelbrot set. If Mandelbrot had no ego, he would have just called it "calculate z_{n+1} = z_n²+1 for each point repeatedly; color it black if it converges...". Ponder this.…
Hi. Do you think the performance of Wikipedia during this period would be improved if you had no ego? I think it would. Without an ego, a more optimal solution would result from multiple cycles of self-refutation.
Can you make it part of the guidelines to not use ego? Without ego, comments contain substance and are civil.
Why not just remove ego from humanity?
Have both of you considered taking with less ego?
Someone could judge the original poster for not saying "Mandelbrot". In turn, the original poster can judge whoever discovered it for wanting to put a name to pure math. That is the cycle of judgement. Without ego, I…
If you had no ego, you would just say Mandelbrot set. If Mandelbrot had no ego, he would have just called it "calculate z_{n+1} = z_n²+1 for each point repeatedly; color it black if it converges...". Ponder this.…
Hi. Do you think the performance of Wikipedia during this period would be improved if you had no ego? I think it would. Without an ego, a more optimal solution would result from multiple cycles of self-refutation.
Can you make it part of the guidelines to not use ego? Without ego, comments contain substance and are civil.