> real-world autonomy isn't really working It works in limited ways. Waymo, Wayve, Baidu Apollo, Tesla FSD and others seem to rely on VLAs, VLMs or transformer models in general.
> if discovering the required technology to build a self-replicating interstellar probe requires solving an instance of an EXP problem[...] Ah, I think I know why I felt it was very unlikely. Engineering constraints…
It's hard to solve P?=NP due to P!=NP.
Protecting forests is good and all, but it will not reverse climate change. We'll have to stop all fossil fuel burning and, additionally, sequester around 600 billion tonnes of CO2 (that's taking into account all the…
> they still wanted to see someone in person. Well, that someone might use AI diagnostic tools too.
> there is no reason to believe that the way to build it would be found before, say, the sun runs out of hydrogen. A lot of computational power can be thrown at the problem in this time. So, the problem should admits no…
Autoregressive pretraining (text/images/video prediction) produces a foundational model. You can look at it as a highly compressed conditional probability distribution of the human brain output. The…
It wouldn't be "Ah! It's lupus." It would be "I need the results of such-and-such tests to make a differential diagnosis."
> How is this not obvious to everyone? That RSI can be bottlenecked? I guess this is obvious to many people. Whether RSI will be bottlenecked (at some not very interesting stage) is another question.
Noise begins to settle down... "Continual RL is all you need" paper comes out.
By achieving the same or a higher level of effectiveness than doctors, obviously.
How else would you trust a tangled mess of neurons to produce something that works? Artificial neurons, of course, hehe.
From my POV it's "we haven't found physical processes that allow to do information processing, which is relevant to learning, exponentially faster than digital computers and we aren't likely to find them in the brain."
Stochastic gradient descent can be likened to traveling down a canyon. But inference? Hardly.
Yep, I'm fairly certain that general learning algorithms acting upon an ANN (which is fairly general too, see the universal approximation theorem) can reach and surpass performance of the human brain. As we have…
People are so confident that this just-a-tool will hit its limits any day now...
Attempts to formalize dialectics do exist, but it mostly stays at a word-weaving level.
Classical physics doesn't have particles that are simultaneously here and not here. It's a discrepancy between theory and experiment.
> things could be true and false at the same time at other scale. Being true and false at the same time is a contradiction. There is such a thing as mathematical intuitionism that rejects the rule of excluded middle,…
Kenyans who provided the data for RLHF liked that style. That's all. And a transformer is not an "averaging machine", it's a prediction machine.
What about the German confederation? A list of countries with a governing body is a bit more than a list.
I guess we can use a bit of 44 petawatts of solar energy falling on Earth in electric cars.
Why so sensitive? There are other battery chemistries that are less dangerous and that are less like tire fire.
If I'm not mistaken, a lithium battery grid-level energy storage firefighting protocol is "evacuate people and let it burn."
Does it work the other way around? Does breathing air with 0% CO2 improve human cognitive performance? I haven't been able to find any research on the effects of lower CO2 concentrations.
> real-world autonomy isn't really working It works in limited ways. Waymo, Wayve, Baidu Apollo, Tesla FSD and others seem to rely on VLAs, VLMs or transformer models in general.
> if discovering the required technology to build a self-replicating interstellar probe requires solving an instance of an EXP problem[...] Ah, I think I know why I felt it was very unlikely. Engineering constraints…
It's hard to solve P?=NP due to P!=NP.
Protecting forests is good and all, but it will not reverse climate change. We'll have to stop all fossil fuel burning and, additionally, sequester around 600 billion tonnes of CO2 (that's taking into account all the…
> they still wanted to see someone in person. Well, that someone might use AI diagnostic tools too.
> there is no reason to believe that the way to build it would be found before, say, the sun runs out of hydrogen. A lot of computational power can be thrown at the problem in this time. So, the problem should admits no…
Autoregressive pretraining (text/images/video prediction) produces a foundational model. You can look at it as a highly compressed conditional probability distribution of the human brain output. The…
It wouldn't be "Ah! It's lupus." It would be "I need the results of such-and-such tests to make a differential diagnosis."
> How is this not obvious to everyone? That RSI can be bottlenecked? I guess this is obvious to many people. Whether RSI will be bottlenecked (at some not very interesting stage) is another question.
Noise begins to settle down... "Continual RL is all you need" paper comes out.
By achieving the same or a higher level of effectiveness than doctors, obviously.
How else would you trust a tangled mess of neurons to produce something that works? Artificial neurons, of course, hehe.
From my POV it's "we haven't found physical processes that allow to do information processing, which is relevant to learning, exponentially faster than digital computers and we aren't likely to find them in the brain."
Stochastic gradient descent can be likened to traveling down a canyon. But inference? Hardly.
Yep, I'm fairly certain that general learning algorithms acting upon an ANN (which is fairly general too, see the universal approximation theorem) can reach and surpass performance of the human brain. As we have…
People are so confident that this just-a-tool will hit its limits any day now...
Attempts to formalize dialectics do exist, but it mostly stays at a word-weaving level.
Classical physics doesn't have particles that are simultaneously here and not here. It's a discrepancy between theory and experiment.
> things could be true and false at the same time at other scale. Being true and false at the same time is a contradiction. There is such a thing as mathematical intuitionism that rejects the rule of excluded middle,…
Kenyans who provided the data for RLHF liked that style. That's all. And a transformer is not an "averaging machine", it's a prediction machine.
What about the German confederation? A list of countries with a governing body is a bit more than a list.
I guess we can use a bit of 44 petawatts of solar energy falling on Earth in electric cars.
Why so sensitive? There are other battery chemistries that are less dangerous and that are less like tire fire.
If I'm not mistaken, a lithium battery grid-level energy storage firefighting protocol is "evacuate people and let it burn."
Does it work the other way around? Does breathing air with 0% CO2 improve human cognitive performance? I haven't been able to find any research on the effects of lower CO2 concentrations.