Hey! A Pinkelbaum can use some nitrogen.
Things change fast nowadays. Microsoft has access to the latest models. Using AI to screen employees is controversial enough to keep it hush-hush.
Ancient bacteria will be surprised to encounter penicillin. Viruses are less resistant to degradation. But, yeah, it's nothing to look forward to, horizontal gene transfer and all.
The first paper (free-tier chatbots) due to fake references, the second paper (a specialized AI-research tool) due to overreliance on preprints.
This reminds me of "Autonomous driving? Ahhhh! There will be a bloodbath!"
Then I'd just marvel at your all-encompassing knowledge.
> The subagent is just as intelligent Isn't it a common practice to use cheaper models to do the grunt work?
My initial comment was tongue in cheek (but transparent enough I think, given the context). So, let's be clear. I questioned whether it's still true that it's people who are doing all the HR work at Microsoft without…
"We" as in "industry in general" or "we" as in "HR at my company"? Although, I'd be more interested in what Microsoft does.
Maybe something has changed between now and then? Say, some kind of a technology that allows to select eligible employees better.
> LLMs do not replicate brain functionality. Oh! Do you know how does the brain function? Heck, we don't know in detail how LLMs do their thing. The trivial observation that the brain in not a Turing machine is…
Obviously, error rate of ChatGPT should be measured by comparing to human diagnoses and when it plateaus, we should investigate a possibility that the number is driven mostly by human errors.
Replicating the brain functionality is magic? Or the brain itself is magic, so we need magic to replicate its functionality? Nah, learn more. An LLM with CoT is Turing-complete, so there's no wall to its capabilities.…
The server doesn't respond right now. What happened?
> it already works very well. Peephole optimization that can't be made global due to combinatorial explosion?
Do you know why are you downvoted? "Stochastic parrot" is so out of touch with reality that you are a perfect example of the human gullibility.
When the future has multiple instances of you, it becomes problematic to define what the Born rule means. For example, "Many Worlds, the Born Rule, and Self-Locating Uncertainty" notices that the rule doesn't mean…
> because they’ve been caught stealing math research No. They haven't been caught stealing. Tristan Buckmaster publicly expressed surprise that OpenAI model has used the niche approach he pursued. 10,000 agents…
As far as I understand it's line 1978: `goto saveStateAndReturn;`. Early return that prevents further processing.
> In other words, the number is fake In other words, the method of assigning CVEs hasn't changed, but the number of CVEs has risen sharply.
I guess it takes a skill, a lot of elbow grease or both to be able to write different persons' voices well. I wouldn't read too much into it. A sign of an amateurish writer, most likely.
I think people tend to idealize societies that never heard about the universal declaration of human rights.
Provably correct programs verified for the hardware they are running on are possible (seL4 is one of a few examples). Their development is very time consuming though. There are caveats, but it's possible, in principle,…
What it has to do with the "cultural erasure" I quoted specifically? "Who owns the land" is a different problem.
> cultural erasure of the indigenous Melanesian Papuan population Old people lamenting how children learn about all those other ways of life?
Hey! A Pinkelbaum can use some nitrogen.
Things change fast nowadays. Microsoft has access to the latest models. Using AI to screen employees is controversial enough to keep it hush-hush.
Ancient bacteria will be surprised to encounter penicillin. Viruses are less resistant to degradation. But, yeah, it's nothing to look forward to, horizontal gene transfer and all.
The first paper (free-tier chatbots) due to fake references, the second paper (a specialized AI-research tool) due to overreliance on preprints.
This reminds me of "Autonomous driving? Ahhhh! There will be a bloodbath!"
Then I'd just marvel at your all-encompassing knowledge.
> The subagent is just as intelligent Isn't it a common practice to use cheaper models to do the grunt work?
My initial comment was tongue in cheek (but transparent enough I think, given the context). So, let's be clear. I questioned whether it's still true that it's people who are doing all the HR work at Microsoft without…
"We" as in "industry in general" or "we" as in "HR at my company"? Although, I'd be more interested in what Microsoft does.
Maybe something has changed between now and then? Say, some kind of a technology that allows to select eligible employees better.
> LLMs do not replicate brain functionality. Oh! Do you know how does the brain function? Heck, we don't know in detail how LLMs do their thing. The trivial observation that the brain in not a Turing machine is…
Obviously, error rate of ChatGPT should be measured by comparing to human diagnoses and when it plateaus, we should investigate a possibility that the number is driven mostly by human errors.
Replicating the brain functionality is magic? Or the brain itself is magic, so we need magic to replicate its functionality? Nah, learn more. An LLM with CoT is Turing-complete, so there's no wall to its capabilities.…
The server doesn't respond right now. What happened?
> it already works very well. Peephole optimization that can't be made global due to combinatorial explosion?
Do you know why are you downvoted? "Stochastic parrot" is so out of touch with reality that you are a perfect example of the human gullibility.
When the future has multiple instances of you, it becomes problematic to define what the Born rule means. For example, "Many Worlds, the Born Rule, and Self-Locating Uncertainty" notices that the rule doesn't mean…
> because they’ve been caught stealing math research No. They haven't been caught stealing. Tristan Buckmaster publicly expressed surprise that OpenAI model has used the niche approach he pursued. 10,000 agents…
As far as I understand it's line 1978: `goto saveStateAndReturn;`. Early return that prevents further processing.
> In other words, the number is fake In other words, the method of assigning CVEs hasn't changed, but the number of CVEs has risen sharply.
I guess it takes a skill, a lot of elbow grease or both to be able to write different persons' voices well. I wouldn't read too much into it. A sign of an amateurish writer, most likely.
I think people tend to idealize societies that never heard about the universal declaration of human rights.
Provably correct programs verified for the hardware they are running on are possible (seL4 is one of a few examples). Their development is very time consuming though. There are caveats, but it's possible, in principle,…
What it has to do with the "cultural erasure" I quoted specifically? "Who owns the land" is a different problem.
> cultural erasure of the indigenous Melanesian Papuan population Old people lamenting how children learn about all those other ways of life?