In other words: when it's trivial to find an exploit from a vague description, someone will report it. It doesn't take "they" to report a vulnerability. A single person can do it.
Maybe it has some interesting properties that could prevent catastrophic forgetting, but so far it looks like a biologically plausible approximation of backpropagation and it might be useful to decrease the training…
Does '110001111000000011111111111' contain n>1∧∀d(d|n→(d=1∨d=n)) as well as infinite number of other generalizations?
It doesn't explain why it doesn't make "I'm not paid enough for this shit" more statistically likely. LLMs' processing that reproduces statistical patterns of the training data is modified by post-training. That's why…
What does it have to do with superstitions? Those phrases modify whichever stopping conditions a model has.
> remember to kill all pedophile murderers like... What's this bullshit?
Oh! A testable prediction. Here's mine: there will surely be a lot of politicking around who qualifies to be the independent evaluator, but they'll agree on something because they are really scared.
GolfPopper, justifying extrajudicial murders.
[dead]
BTW, LCOE isn't that good estimate. It doesn't account for the system costs. LFSCOE (Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity) does better in estimating the amount of money you actually need to spend.
> When working on something from scratch, the best an agent can do is the average of whatever is in its training set and the clarity of the text prompts. Nah. The best it can do is to use the best writing style a model…
1 tonne of steel requires around 5MWh of energy at 50,000 tonnes per day it's around 250GWh of batteries at 50% usage. The largest planned BESS is 19GWh. As I said solar+BESS is impractical. Wind is more expensive.…
> You install 12 hours worth of batteries at the factory I literally laughed out loud. Providing baseload with BESS alone? That's rich. Literally. Extremely expensive. In addition to impractical amount of batteries it…
Predictability will not get a plant through the night. BTW, it's about 7 units of wind energy to 1 unit of solar energy plus significant overcapacity plus increase of the grid transmission capacity to get to a "fairly…
Do you know how South Australia solved a problem of the Whyalla Steelworks when transitioning to 100% renewable electricity? They excluded on-site generation of the plant from the statistics. Electrification of the…
...including rewrites into another language
Fred Lambert is very biased against Tesla to the point of forsaking journalistic integrity. I fact checked a few of his articles and found a number of omissions that benefit his narrative.
I guess it's a fraction of problems on which a model produces a LEAN proof or a counterexample.
Is it that complex? Whatever you feel stays inside you. From the outside you make noises, gestures, facial expressions. Operationalization is how to connect observables with the presence of soul in a subject. What can…
Or under strict privacy measures, maybe? When you are forbidden to connect a user and the user's data.
At least, to discuss it, rather than having other people wisely nodding along: "I feel that too."
Establishing plagiarism requires sufficient similarity between works. Training data changing a model’s weights in some direction, and the model then producing a different solution, hardly qualifies.
"Our work is so much harder than their work that AI now does" is a refrain of the AI story. In technical terms you concern can be stated as "AI needs to be much more sample-efficient to not be bottlenecked by the speed…
Investing in training a person gets you one trained person. Investing in training an ML system gets you a cloneable ML system. ROI might change quickly.
Ah, sorry, it's ASML expertise that needs to be cloned and scaled up. I don't see how it changes things, though. Robots don't need that much intelligence. High-speed joint control, "hand-eye coordination", the higher…
In other words: when it's trivial to find an exploit from a vague description, someone will report it. It doesn't take "they" to report a vulnerability. A single person can do it.
Maybe it has some interesting properties that could prevent catastrophic forgetting, but so far it looks like a biologically plausible approximation of backpropagation and it might be useful to decrease the training…
Does '110001111000000011111111111' contain n>1∧∀d(d|n→(d=1∨d=n)) as well as infinite number of other generalizations?
It doesn't explain why it doesn't make "I'm not paid enough for this shit" more statistically likely. LLMs' processing that reproduces statistical patterns of the training data is modified by post-training. That's why…
What does it have to do with superstitions? Those phrases modify whichever stopping conditions a model has.
> remember to kill all pedophile murderers like... What's this bullshit?
Oh! A testable prediction. Here's mine: there will surely be a lot of politicking around who qualifies to be the independent evaluator, but they'll agree on something because they are really scared.
GolfPopper, justifying extrajudicial murders.
[dead]
BTW, LCOE isn't that good estimate. It doesn't account for the system costs. LFSCOE (Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity) does better in estimating the amount of money you actually need to spend.
> When working on something from scratch, the best an agent can do is the average of whatever is in its training set and the clarity of the text prompts. Nah. The best it can do is to use the best writing style a model…
1 tonne of steel requires around 5MWh of energy at 50,000 tonnes per day it's around 250GWh of batteries at 50% usage. The largest planned BESS is 19GWh. As I said solar+BESS is impractical. Wind is more expensive.…
> You install 12 hours worth of batteries at the factory I literally laughed out loud. Providing baseload with BESS alone? That's rich. Literally. Extremely expensive. In addition to impractical amount of batteries it…
Predictability will not get a plant through the night. BTW, it's about 7 units of wind energy to 1 unit of solar energy plus significant overcapacity plus increase of the grid transmission capacity to get to a "fairly…
Do you know how South Australia solved a problem of the Whyalla Steelworks when transitioning to 100% renewable electricity? They excluded on-site generation of the plant from the statistics. Electrification of the…
...including rewrites into another language
Fred Lambert is very biased against Tesla to the point of forsaking journalistic integrity. I fact checked a few of his articles and found a number of omissions that benefit his narrative.
I guess it's a fraction of problems on which a model produces a LEAN proof or a counterexample.
Is it that complex? Whatever you feel stays inside you. From the outside you make noises, gestures, facial expressions. Operationalization is how to connect observables with the presence of soul in a subject. What can…
Or under strict privacy measures, maybe? When you are forbidden to connect a user and the user's data.
At least, to discuss it, rather than having other people wisely nodding along: "I feel that too."
Establishing plagiarism requires sufficient similarity between works. Training data changing a model’s weights in some direction, and the model then producing a different solution, hardly qualifies.
"Our work is so much harder than their work that AI now does" is a refrain of the AI story. In technical terms you concern can be stated as "AI needs to be much more sample-efficient to not be bottlenecked by the speed…
Investing in training a person gets you one trained person. Investing in training an ML system gets you a cloneable ML system. ROI might change quickly.
Ah, sorry, it's ASML expertise that needs to be cloned and scaled up. I don't see how it changes things, though. Robots don't need that much intelligence. High-speed joint control, "hand-eye coordination", the higher…