[flagged]
It's not just you, I'm pretty sure at least the second part of this short text is AI written. By the way writing a short note on your "personal" blog using AI is beyond pathetic.
You are completely missing my point. We are not working for a company here. The 'gzip as a language model' is not a company project. I agree what you say would be right about inner company workings or also when working…
> If you then use AI to write a product page documentation and proof read it for correctness, would that constitute to signaling that the whole effort is superficial? It would constitute signalling possibility the whole…
> Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas. Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'? Now I'm…
so did I, that's why I clicked.
> I'm judging the ideas in your post, not its form. and simultaneously you write that 'my form is lackluster' and that 'an LLM could have written your comment and improved its form without losing anything distinctive'.…
Yay, another mostly AI authored piece with vibe-coded aesthetics. Some will say that I should 'judge the idea, not the form'. But if the author didn't find enough strength to write alone a short ~700 words summary about…
> they imagine their a newly found ability to spot design generated with AI equates to them being able to spot bad design. Who is imagining that? > No, you silly geese. What you are able to spot is somebody using AI…
> You can't call people lazy because they use LLMs I haven't done that at all.
You claim they think they have to listen to missionaries?
> If they work, does it matter? The blog post provides something akin to answer to this question: You see, the main allure of LLMs is that they allow the developer to be more lazy. That’s kind of the whole point! You…
> They see it as some great holy mission from god to go out into the hinterlands and convert the local people from their local existing belief system to their own particular form of Christianity. Call me apologist, but…
> I don't agree. Good writing and good ideas are entirely different things. Just read all the beautifully written, inaccurate stuff by the NYT or the Guardian. I'd be very curious of some examples when great ideas are…
"Too long" is a property visible from the very start. "written by an LLM" is not. Any better advice?
Ok, tell me then how exactly can I "not read it" when it's NOT disclosed? The subject interests me so I'm beginning to read, only to waste minutes of my precious life on realising this is another long-winded slop. How…
> I dont get the investment in humanoids beyond trying to create some kind of stock market bubble again. Our entire world is heavily adjusted towards bipedal humanoid creatures. Having a moving humanoid tool who could…
The heavy usage of LLM writing as is the case here is a strong signal it doesn't and isn't. I won't waste my time on a person who didn't bother to express themselves.
I'm really sick of LLM writing.
Oh, use they did, 100% Pangram score for a whole text doesn't come from small polish.
Of course it is. And as usual the comment pointing this out is being downvoted and only to be found at the end of the thread. This aggregator's community approach to important signals like that is baffling.
It's worse than that, the underlying data is more than questionable.
This is not a "map of castles". I checked my local area, and it omits interesting castles, instead including palaces, landmarks and world war era fortresses. Shameful submission.
You've confused the threads: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523992
How exactly is existence of the "Get a free trial" banner an "opinion"?
[flagged]
It's not just you, I'm pretty sure at least the second part of this short text is AI written. By the way writing a short note on your "personal" blog using AI is beyond pathetic.
You are completely missing my point. We are not working for a company here. The 'gzip as a language model' is not a company project. I agree what you say would be right about inner company workings or also when working…
> If you then use AI to write a product page documentation and proof read it for correctness, would that constitute to signaling that the whole effort is superficial? It would constitute signalling possibility the whole…
> Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas. Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'? Now I'm…
so did I, that's why I clicked.
> I'm judging the ideas in your post, not its form. and simultaneously you write that 'my form is lackluster' and that 'an LLM could have written your comment and improved its form without losing anything distinctive'.…
Yay, another mostly AI authored piece with vibe-coded aesthetics. Some will say that I should 'judge the idea, not the form'. But if the author didn't find enough strength to write alone a short ~700 words summary about…
> they imagine their a newly found ability to spot design generated with AI equates to them being able to spot bad design. Who is imagining that? > No, you silly geese. What you are able to spot is somebody using AI…
> You can't call people lazy because they use LLMs I haven't done that at all.
You claim they think they have to listen to missionaries?
> If they work, does it matter? The blog post provides something akin to answer to this question: You see, the main allure of LLMs is that they allow the developer to be more lazy. That’s kind of the whole point! You…
> They see it as some great holy mission from god to go out into the hinterlands and convert the local people from their local existing belief system to their own particular form of Christianity. Call me apologist, but…
> I don't agree. Good writing and good ideas are entirely different things. Just read all the beautifully written, inaccurate stuff by the NYT or the Guardian. I'd be very curious of some examples when great ideas are…
"Too long" is a property visible from the very start. "written by an LLM" is not. Any better advice?
Ok, tell me then how exactly can I "not read it" when it's NOT disclosed? The subject interests me so I'm beginning to read, only to waste minutes of my precious life on realising this is another long-winded slop. How…
> I dont get the investment in humanoids beyond trying to create some kind of stock market bubble again. Our entire world is heavily adjusted towards bipedal humanoid creatures. Having a moving humanoid tool who could…
The heavy usage of LLM writing as is the case here is a strong signal it doesn't and isn't. I won't waste my time on a person who didn't bother to express themselves.
I'm really sick of LLM writing.
Oh, use they did, 100% Pangram score for a whole text doesn't come from small polish.
Of course it is. And as usual the comment pointing this out is being downvoted and only to be found at the end of the thread. This aggregator's community approach to important signals like that is baffling.
It's worse than that, the underlying data is more than questionable.
This is not a "map of castles". I checked my local area, and it omits interesting castles, instead including palaces, landmarks and world war era fortresses. Shameful submission.
You've confused the threads: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523992
How exactly is existence of the "Get a free trial" banner an "opinion"?