> I don't agree. Good writing and good ideas are entirely different things. Just read all the beautifully written, inaccurate stuff by the NYT or the Guardian. I'd be very curious of some examples when great ideas are…
"Too long" is a property visible from the very start. "written by an LLM" is not. Any better advice?
Ok, tell me then how exactly can I "not read it" when it's NOT disclosed? The subject interests me so I'm beginning to read, only to waste minutes of my precious life on realising this is another long-winded slop. How…
> I dont get the investment in humanoids beyond trying to create some kind of stock market bubble again. Our entire world is heavily adjusted towards bipedal humanoid creatures. Having a moving humanoid tool who could…
The heavy usage of LLM writing as is the case here is a strong signal it doesn't and isn't. I won't waste my time on a person who didn't bother to express themselves.
I'm really sick of LLM writing.
Oh, use they did, 100% Pangram score for a whole text doesn't come from small polish.
Of course it is. And as usual the comment pointing this out is being downvoted and only to be found at the end of the thread. This aggregator's community approach to important signals like that is baffling.
It's worse than that, the underlying data is more than questionable.
This is not a "map of castles". I checked my local area, and it omits interesting castles, instead including palaces, landmarks and world war era fortresses. Shameful submission.
You've confused the threads: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523992
How exactly is existence of the "Get a free trial" banner an "opinion"?
I'd be interested to test your claim, could you show me examples of this "prompt or two"?
Seriously? - Marketing material? check - Bloated to the extreme? check - "Get a free trial" at the end? check - Entirely LLM generated? check
Yes, and the problem we are having here is 'raw' output. LLMgenerated slop is zero-effort bullshit, not an elaborate scheme to prove a philosophical thesis. There is no economy for mediaworkers doing the latter. Similar…
I don't know what your experience is, according to mine there are some people who are better than chance at picking this up. And I believe my experience is something expected. People are also certain kind of a neural…
As of now there are only two somewhat reliable tools. First one is Pangram. Other available detectors are varying level of bad, with some of them entirely shit (eg zerogpt something). The second one is human mind. Read…
Äh, was?
So, snippet from the article says the following: > I understand that Microsoft is planning to remove most of its Claude Code licenses and push many of its developers to use Copilot CLI instead. While Claude Code has…
Hacker News has developed recently a frustrating habit of upvoting such low quality AI sloppy submissions. Makes me wonder if this AI flood uncovers the unflattering truth about this community acuteness, or it's only a…
Reading this to the very end uncovers empty and contradictory advice. I'm almost sure it's LLM generated. We learn simultaneously that 'your team' shouldn't rely on any one of those patterns ('none of them is enough'),…
The stats are wrong - on Android my finger has not moved triple digit times, and I haven't tapped double digit times. In 4 seconds. My general location is also wrong. This site's theme is barely visible. And the entire…
> it's not crap because it's AI generated, it's crap because I can tell it's AI generated, full of fluff, cliches and a lack of substance. Yes, exactly this. If I notice it means your PhD-level 2027 ASI technology…
> I downvote them because they are tangential to the content. They are like complaints about scroll bars and back button hijacking, or annoyances about the website's color scheme I don't agree with you. They are not at…
> I think your comment was maybe downvoted for being so terse and dismissive. Yes, I know, but what motivated me to ask was that from my observations also less derisive comments raising AI point are prone to being…
> I don't agree. Good writing and good ideas are entirely different things. Just read all the beautifully written, inaccurate stuff by the NYT or the Guardian. I'd be very curious of some examples when great ideas are…
"Too long" is a property visible from the very start. "written by an LLM" is not. Any better advice?
Ok, tell me then how exactly can I "not read it" when it's NOT disclosed? The subject interests me so I'm beginning to read, only to waste minutes of my precious life on realising this is another long-winded slop. How…
> I dont get the investment in humanoids beyond trying to create some kind of stock market bubble again. Our entire world is heavily adjusted towards bipedal humanoid creatures. Having a moving humanoid tool who could…
The heavy usage of LLM writing as is the case here is a strong signal it doesn't and isn't. I won't waste my time on a person who didn't bother to express themselves.
I'm really sick of LLM writing.
Oh, use they did, 100% Pangram score for a whole text doesn't come from small polish.
Of course it is. And as usual the comment pointing this out is being downvoted and only to be found at the end of the thread. This aggregator's community approach to important signals like that is baffling.
It's worse than that, the underlying data is more than questionable.
This is not a "map of castles". I checked my local area, and it omits interesting castles, instead including palaces, landmarks and world war era fortresses. Shameful submission.
You've confused the threads: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523992
How exactly is existence of the "Get a free trial" banner an "opinion"?
I'd be interested to test your claim, could you show me examples of this "prompt or two"?
Seriously? - Marketing material? check - Bloated to the extreme? check - "Get a free trial" at the end? check - Entirely LLM generated? check
Yes, and the problem we are having here is 'raw' output. LLMgenerated slop is zero-effort bullshit, not an elaborate scheme to prove a philosophical thesis. There is no economy for mediaworkers doing the latter. Similar…
I don't know what your experience is, according to mine there are some people who are better than chance at picking this up. And I believe my experience is something expected. People are also certain kind of a neural…
As of now there are only two somewhat reliable tools. First one is Pangram. Other available detectors are varying level of bad, with some of them entirely shit (eg zerogpt something). The second one is human mind. Read…
Äh, was?
So, snippet from the article says the following: > I understand that Microsoft is planning to remove most of its Claude Code licenses and push many of its developers to use Copilot CLI instead. While Claude Code has…
Hacker News has developed recently a frustrating habit of upvoting such low quality AI sloppy submissions. Makes me wonder if this AI flood uncovers the unflattering truth about this community acuteness, or it's only a…
Reading this to the very end uncovers empty and contradictory advice. I'm almost sure it's LLM generated. We learn simultaneously that 'your team' shouldn't rely on any one of those patterns ('none of them is enough'),…
The stats are wrong - on Android my finger has not moved triple digit times, and I haven't tapped double digit times. In 4 seconds. My general location is also wrong. This site's theme is barely visible. And the entire…
> it's not crap because it's AI generated, it's crap because I can tell it's AI generated, full of fluff, cliches and a lack of substance. Yes, exactly this. If I notice it means your PhD-level 2027 ASI technology…
> I downvote them because they are tangential to the content. They are like complaints about scroll bars and back button hijacking, or annoyances about the website's color scheme I don't agree with you. They are not at…
> I think your comment was maybe downvoted for being so terse and dismissive. Yes, I know, but what motivated me to ask was that from my observations also less derisive comments raising AI point are prone to being…