Judging from comment history (esp from around 8 month ago) the probability of a shill account seems exceptionally high.
This also looks like a suspicious account, at best ideologically motivated, at worst state sponsored. Look at his comments on p.3 of his comment history.
One can never be sure given that Wikipedia articles are open for anyone to edit (it's interesting to note that there's a tremendous amount of controversy over whether these atrocities indeed happened, and that…
Heads up that OP seems to have posted a disproportionate amount of pro China comments in the past year. This just looks like another attempt at psychological manipulation and generating more sympathy for the Chinese.…
Judging from comment history (esp from around 8 month ago) the probability of a shill account seems exceptionally high.
This also looks like a suspicious account, at best ideologically motivated, at worst state sponsored. Look at his comments on p.3 of his comment history.
One can never be sure given that Wikipedia articles are open for anyone to edit (it's interesting to note that there's a tremendous amount of controversy over whether these atrocities indeed happened, and that…
Heads up that OP seems to have posted a disproportionate amount of pro China comments in the past year. This just looks like another attempt at psychological manipulation and generating more sympathy for the Chinese.…