Added parenthesis to make what your parent commentor is saying clearer: >I appreciate that the author clearly states that security, (i.e., output can't be reversed back to the input), is a non-requirement.
In their defense, NASA did use the same artistic rendition...
They're going to build it enough to the point that Salesforce will buy them.
From the article: >Mr. Paxton said in a statement. “I will continue to fight Big Tech to ensure the privacy and security of all Texans.” It's obvious pandering to the masses. This is about Mr.Paxton trying to get some…
>Which you replied to with a very apathetic and condescending Well, he did say he felt offended that he wasn't included in the list. >You should have used this as an opportunity to make your employees believe they made…
>Flashing headlights is also "i see you trying to merge in front of me and i'll give you space." I do this for the same reason - or more generalized - 'I see you are about to do _x_, and I acknowledge - go ahead'.
Added parenthesis to make what your parent commentor is saying clearer: >I appreciate that the author clearly states that security, (i.e., output can't be reversed back to the input), is a non-requirement.
In their defense, NASA did use the same artistic rendition...
They're going to build it enough to the point that Salesforce will buy them.
From the article: >Mr. Paxton said in a statement. “I will continue to fight Big Tech to ensure the privacy and security of all Texans.” It's obvious pandering to the masses. This is about Mr.Paxton trying to get some…
>Which you replied to with a very apathetic and condescending Well, he did say he felt offended that he wasn't included in the list. >You should have used this as an opportunity to make your employees believe they made…
>Flashing headlights is also "i see you trying to merge in front of me and i'll give you space." I do this for the same reason - or more generalized - 'I see you are about to do _x_, and I acknowledge - go ahead'.