>the situation was escalated by the store owner. The younger Allyn Gibson tried to take a picture of the shoplifter as evidence and he was violently attacked. I don't know where you got the idea that he was the…
The second statement is censoring the word "fucks" which is not racist. It was used in this context to try and make it seem like a different word.
So the courts decide calling the family and the store racist was libel and slanderous, and it was upheld after sever appeals. Despite that, you are trying to claim that the Gibson's are racist? I don't understand what…
It does not single them out in opposition to the group. Say "we don't do that here" puts the transgressor on one side and the "we" on the other side. Saying "when you do" is not putting the transgressor on a side, but…
In situations like that, there is no need to engage. The transgressor is being defensive of their actions and I could easily see the same response to saying "we don't do that here" "Don't do what? Why wouldn't we make…
This was a follow up to the original transgression, you have to be clear of what you are shutting down, before you shut it down. Again the two statements I said are much clearer and don't single out the recipient.
I fully disagree with your sentiment. Yes there are outright bigoted jokes, but I believe many people have a different line in the sand of where appropriate and inappropriate are. There are many jokes that one workplace…
Your point is fine when it comes to a group of friends, that you most likely self selected, but I have to disagree when it is in the workplace, (a mixture of different values and opinions). It is important that everyone…
>Giving a justification is seen by these people are an excuse to debate. I know what you mean here, but I disagree that my suggestion opens up a debate. It is clear what about the action in question was, and it politely…
>It makes clear, though still implicit, that was has been transgressed is a social norm specific to that context. But it really doesn't though. In the example of the off color, (e.g. racist), joke, saying "we don't do…
>I don't need to spend an hour giving a coworker an explanation of why their actions are hurtful. But the point is, saying "we don't do that here" doesn't inform the person that their actions are hurtful. It just tells…
But people HATE pay as you go installed apps. Take Word, (MS office), for example. The way I see it, I downloaded this software, it is fully available on my computer taking up space, but I have to pay you for the key to…
>but the sensitivity and security required for dealing with healthcare data I'm curious why you think this. Disclaimer I have worked for a cloud based EHR system as well as a HIPAA compliant mobile/web app. We haven't…
If you have the app on your phone, or any app that uses their sdk, yes.
You are trying to argue semantics and claim that I am maliciously lying. >Your characterization of historic vaccines is not correct at all. Please point out exactly what I said that is not correct. >It's no different…
First of all, yes your definition of a vaccine is fine, but it doesn't negate what I said. Vaccines serve as a way to "train" your immune system to fight a specific thing by historically providing a weakened or impotent…
>That last statement is incorrect. Actually it is correct. The mRNA vaccine types target specific spike proteins of the virus. So no we do not currently have a vaccine, so the previous vaccines actually offer quite…
>Natural immunity from which strain and how long ago? Doesn't matter. If you have already take the vaccines, it is my opinion that it is better to get the omicron variant and have natural immunity, (unless of course you…
>but this misinformation about the effectiveness of COVID vaccines is getting out of hand. Nothing I stated is misinformation. The the current vaccines are not effective at preventing the spread of omicron. So to say…
Not for omicron, or the next variant, or the one after that. At some point we have to face reality, and no it is not eugenics, it called "life".
>"let god sort em out" is just eugenics. LOL its not eugenics, its the same for every other infectious disease without a vaccine. Everyone will get omicron/some variant at some point.
>generalizable across most industries. I was trying to point out that it is not just industries, its literally life. This is anecdotal, but many of the teachers I personally know are anti-in person learning, but still…
>requiring vaccination instead Why not natural immunity instead?
You will get COVID at some point, and it won't be because you were careful, you forgot to wear a mask, or you encountered unvaccinated/unmasked people. It will be because this virus is endemic and at some point everyone…
There is inconclusive evidence that children are vectors of transmission to teachers. At the very least it is the same as any public gathering. So your "options" would apply to every aspect of life, (Grocery store,…
>the situation was escalated by the store owner. The younger Allyn Gibson tried to take a picture of the shoplifter as evidence and he was violently attacked. I don't know where you got the idea that he was the…
The second statement is censoring the word "fucks" which is not racist. It was used in this context to try and make it seem like a different word.
So the courts decide calling the family and the store racist was libel and slanderous, and it was upheld after sever appeals. Despite that, you are trying to claim that the Gibson's are racist? I don't understand what…
It does not single them out in opposition to the group. Say "we don't do that here" puts the transgressor on one side and the "we" on the other side. Saying "when you do" is not putting the transgressor on a side, but…
In situations like that, there is no need to engage. The transgressor is being defensive of their actions and I could easily see the same response to saying "we don't do that here" "Don't do what? Why wouldn't we make…
This was a follow up to the original transgression, you have to be clear of what you are shutting down, before you shut it down. Again the two statements I said are much clearer and don't single out the recipient.
I fully disagree with your sentiment. Yes there are outright bigoted jokes, but I believe many people have a different line in the sand of where appropriate and inappropriate are. There are many jokes that one workplace…
Your point is fine when it comes to a group of friends, that you most likely self selected, but I have to disagree when it is in the workplace, (a mixture of different values and opinions). It is important that everyone…
>Giving a justification is seen by these people are an excuse to debate. I know what you mean here, but I disagree that my suggestion opens up a debate. It is clear what about the action in question was, and it politely…
>It makes clear, though still implicit, that was has been transgressed is a social norm specific to that context. But it really doesn't though. In the example of the off color, (e.g. racist), joke, saying "we don't do…
>I don't need to spend an hour giving a coworker an explanation of why their actions are hurtful. But the point is, saying "we don't do that here" doesn't inform the person that their actions are hurtful. It just tells…
But people HATE pay as you go installed apps. Take Word, (MS office), for example. The way I see it, I downloaded this software, it is fully available on my computer taking up space, but I have to pay you for the key to…
>but the sensitivity and security required for dealing with healthcare data I'm curious why you think this. Disclaimer I have worked for a cloud based EHR system as well as a HIPAA compliant mobile/web app. We haven't…
If you have the app on your phone, or any app that uses their sdk, yes.
You are trying to argue semantics and claim that I am maliciously lying. >Your characterization of historic vaccines is not correct at all. Please point out exactly what I said that is not correct. >It's no different…
First of all, yes your definition of a vaccine is fine, but it doesn't negate what I said. Vaccines serve as a way to "train" your immune system to fight a specific thing by historically providing a weakened or impotent…
>That last statement is incorrect. Actually it is correct. The mRNA vaccine types target specific spike proteins of the virus. So no we do not currently have a vaccine, so the previous vaccines actually offer quite…
>Natural immunity from which strain and how long ago? Doesn't matter. If you have already take the vaccines, it is my opinion that it is better to get the omicron variant and have natural immunity, (unless of course you…
>but this misinformation about the effectiveness of COVID vaccines is getting out of hand. Nothing I stated is misinformation. The the current vaccines are not effective at preventing the spread of omicron. So to say…
Not for omicron, or the next variant, or the one after that. At some point we have to face reality, and no it is not eugenics, it called "life".
>"let god sort em out" is just eugenics. LOL its not eugenics, its the same for every other infectious disease without a vaccine. Everyone will get omicron/some variant at some point.
>generalizable across most industries. I was trying to point out that it is not just industries, its literally life. This is anecdotal, but many of the teachers I personally know are anti-in person learning, but still…
>requiring vaccination instead Why not natural immunity instead?
You will get COVID at some point, and it won't be because you were careful, you forgot to wear a mask, or you encountered unvaccinated/unmasked people. It will be because this virus is endemic and at some point everyone…
There is inconclusive evidence that children are vectors of transmission to teachers. At the very least it is the same as any public gathering. So your "options" would apply to every aspect of life, (Grocery store,…