Thank you, that's indeed a better way to model it!
I can relate to most points in the article but definitely not #4. I'm a newbie and Elm's ways of declaring types are confusing to me. There are custom types, type aliases, records, extensible records, opaque types,…
Thank you, that's indeed a better way to model it!
I can relate to most points in the article but definitely not #4. I'm a newbie and Elm's ways of declaring types are confusing to me. There are custom types, type aliases, records, extensible records, opaque types,…