yes, you are right there is no contrast, because both ai(vector nn) and traditional symbolic programs are not aware of inputs/understanding deeper/"excel in domain" outside our interpretation of it. In the way digital…
it is not. in this case these researchers have lost their way, with how symbolics entered the conversation. to remind, it is via wanting to prove that ai vs traditional program is understanding deeper. well guess what,…
> Is evaluating these closed-form representations more computationally efficient? No it is way worse since computationally they are same things with symbolic having overhead of attending to the symbols.
they literally copied logo (even the color!) from phantom
yes, you are right there is no contrast, because both ai(vector nn) and traditional symbolic programs are not aware of inputs/understanding deeper/"excel in domain" outside our interpretation of it. In the way digital…
it is not. in this case these researchers have lost their way, with how symbolics entered the conversation. to remind, it is via wanting to prove that ai vs traditional program is understanding deeper. well guess what,…
> Is evaluating these closed-form representations more computationally efficient? No it is way worse since computationally they are same things with symbolic having overhead of attending to the symbols.
they literally copied logo (even the color!) from phantom