Imagine Caddy had a built-in feature to manage redirects with a very simple syntax. Maybe it could be called redir? That'd help removing the whole "run python to compile a bunch of HTML files" part of this. Oh wait …
The issue here is the high financial burden to have a secure/signed release, not the security itself.
What a tasteless joke of a project name.
100%. I don’t understand the obsession with bending dicts into something they are inherently bad at when actual alternatives in dataclasses and Pydantic models right there.
Should be titled "Python Steering Committee unable/unwilling to provide clear acceptance criteria or timeline for PEP 703".
Imagine Caddy had a built-in feature to manage redirects with a very simple syntax. Maybe it could be called redir? That'd help removing the whole "run python to compile a bunch of HTML files" part of this. Oh wait …
The issue here is the high financial burden to have a secure/signed release, not the security itself.
What a tasteless joke of a project name.
100%. I don’t understand the obsession with bending dicts into something they are inherently bad at when actual alternatives in dataclasses and Pydantic models right there.
Should be titled "Python Steering Committee unable/unwilling to provide clear acceptance criteria or timeline for PEP 703".