Haha sorry for the callout! Saw the M-dash and auto-assumed. Nice write up and thanks for sharing :)
There's definitely some optimization that can occur, like an orchestrator or Ralph.
Have not tried, but interesting. I guess my concern would be the Skill still takes up context space, where as MCP is just using CPU.
Saying "non-repeatable" was probably wrong. "Unique" might be better. Things LLMs arent naturally able to do or infer.
If the model can figure it out with tokens, but my institutional knowledge MCP tool can do it with a few CPU cycles, it’s faster and deterministic and repeatable.
Despite thinking this is AI-generated, I agree but everything has a caveat. Skills are good for instilling non-repeatable, yet intuitive or institutional knowledge. MCP’s are great for custom, repeatable tasks. After…
Haha sorry for the callout! Saw the M-dash and auto-assumed. Nice write up and thanks for sharing :)
There's definitely some optimization that can occur, like an orchestrator or Ralph.
Have not tried, but interesting. I guess my concern would be the Skill still takes up context space, where as MCP is just using CPU.
Saying "non-repeatable" was probably wrong. "Unique" might be better. Things LLMs arent naturally able to do or infer.
If the model can figure it out with tokens, but my institutional knowledge MCP tool can do it with a few CPU cycles, it’s faster and deterministic and repeatable.
Despite thinking this is AI-generated, I agree but everything has a caveat. Skills are good for instilling non-repeatable, yet intuitive or institutional knowledge. MCP’s are great for custom, repeatable tasks. After…