Sure. I can see how the problems being solved would be very different, and would require "re-training." I'm wondering though how much is it the LLMs and how much is it the humans driving them? Could this have been done…
> If you have suggestions on how to name our products better, I'm all ears. Our intention is to make things clear and simple, even if we miss the mark sometimes. I'm not the one you were talking with but catching you is…
I would trade (as if I have any say lol) every single breakthrough they have made in math/CS for _any_ good progress towards a universal cancer cure (very theoretical, I know). I'm kinda hoping they are investing just…
Exactly my thoughts. I find that unless the outcome I'm looking for from the model is almost binary and easily verifiable, it is basically faster to do the work myself. Assumptions made by the models multiply and by the…
I'm incredibly skeptical about everything these frontier labs put out. Results are results though. However, could someone with a firmer grasp on the problems weigh in on how much are these recent results a function of…
> So vote for a government that will do it. There will almost never be a government that does this because the incentives are not there. There are more incentives in prolonging a problem than there are in solving it. >…
> I thought "the sentiment" was "tax the rich because they can afford it". Not "because they can afford it" but "because it doesn't hurt." The "hurt" I'm referring to isn't the wallets of the rich, rather the existing…
Probably. However, I've mostly been trying to watch older movies and I think paramount has some sort of monopoly on them.
I haven't seen the episode but I can imagine the critique is pretty valid. However, sometimes it goes too far in the opposite direction. Sometimes things _are_ actually worse now :)
There's a lot of nostalgic things that do in fact suck, I have no problem admitting that. Subjectively, I will die on the hill that movies overall are getting worse though. They are all starting to feel over-produced…
Honestly I think it's because everything sucks these days. I know there is a lot of survivorship bias going on but _something_ has changed. I have recently been on a 1980-2010's movie binge. It seemed like movies before…
> Paramount Plus has nothing else. This is funny, because every damn time I find something I want to watch its on paramount+. There has to be a paradox/law named after this at this point. "The thing you're trying to…
> That's the sentiment behind every tax Says who? Taxes don't exist to "punish" the rich or successful businesses. They exist to pay for things. If someone is mostly looking forward to the taking of money rather than…
In general, the foundations upon which it was built. In specific, off the top of my head: - you can't group repos - CI/CD is far behind what GitLab offers - Review apps (though I think now you can do this on GH with…
GitHub is such a mess. They seem to be doing everything and nothing. GitLab is 100x better, in terms of DX. While I still have a soft spot for GH, its frustrating to use it when GL exists.
I can agree. I believe the R&D component is very real but will take/has taken a backseat to the business.
That would be great. Unfortunately as soon as governments get more money they will spend it which makes it increasingly harder to spend less.
Sure, not claiming it is the same category. Just the sentiment of "it's just taking a little from the rich so it won't hurt" is similar. The main emotional motivator behind both is to take from the rich.
I honestly don't see how this outcome isn't all but guaranteed. It is actually almost comically self-destructive. Taxes based on the same idea of (just take a bit from the rich) destroyed the Swedish financial markets…
It depends on the day and how honest people feel. If it were truly about numbers they would probably find more success in getting their government to spend smarter.
I am just amazed at how many people are blind to this. Every single time one of these labs does something it is almost always sensationalized. They absolutely cannot refrain from describing how incredible their models…
Sorry for the late reply. If I look in the "Library" at images I have generated, scroll down a bit and click the image, all the images turn black/empty, that image then shifts to the top of the page. Putting it at the…
> Didn't this exact scenario just happen like 3 months ago with Instagram? Hey now, they probably paid millions of tokens to ship that feature.
Not sure I can agree, but the idea is interesting. While the set is finite, software comes and goes. Just look at the tools to build software over the years. > Many software firms have been allowed to bloat up do to the…
I can't even go a day without running into super frustrating bugs on the ChatGPT app.
Sure. I can see how the problems being solved would be very different, and would require "re-training." I'm wondering though how much is it the LLMs and how much is it the humans driving them? Could this have been done…
> If you have suggestions on how to name our products better, I'm all ears. Our intention is to make things clear and simple, even if we miss the mark sometimes. I'm not the one you were talking with but catching you is…
I would trade (as if I have any say lol) every single breakthrough they have made in math/CS for _any_ good progress towards a universal cancer cure (very theoretical, I know). I'm kinda hoping they are investing just…
Exactly my thoughts. I find that unless the outcome I'm looking for from the model is almost binary and easily verifiable, it is basically faster to do the work myself. Assumptions made by the models multiply and by the…
I'm incredibly skeptical about everything these frontier labs put out. Results are results though. However, could someone with a firmer grasp on the problems weigh in on how much are these recent results a function of…
> So vote for a government that will do it. There will almost never be a government that does this because the incentives are not there. There are more incentives in prolonging a problem than there are in solving it. >…
> I thought "the sentiment" was "tax the rich because they can afford it". Not "because they can afford it" but "because it doesn't hurt." The "hurt" I'm referring to isn't the wallets of the rich, rather the existing…
Probably. However, I've mostly been trying to watch older movies and I think paramount has some sort of monopoly on them.
I haven't seen the episode but I can imagine the critique is pretty valid. However, sometimes it goes too far in the opposite direction. Sometimes things _are_ actually worse now :)
There's a lot of nostalgic things that do in fact suck, I have no problem admitting that. Subjectively, I will die on the hill that movies overall are getting worse though. They are all starting to feel over-produced…
Honestly I think it's because everything sucks these days. I know there is a lot of survivorship bias going on but _something_ has changed. I have recently been on a 1980-2010's movie binge. It seemed like movies before…
> Paramount Plus has nothing else. This is funny, because every damn time I find something I want to watch its on paramount+. There has to be a paradox/law named after this at this point. "The thing you're trying to…
> That's the sentiment behind every tax Says who? Taxes don't exist to "punish" the rich or successful businesses. They exist to pay for things. If someone is mostly looking forward to the taking of money rather than…
In general, the foundations upon which it was built. In specific, off the top of my head: - you can't group repos - CI/CD is far behind what GitLab offers - Review apps (though I think now you can do this on GH with…
GitHub is such a mess. They seem to be doing everything and nothing. GitLab is 100x better, in terms of DX. While I still have a soft spot for GH, its frustrating to use it when GL exists.
I can agree. I believe the R&D component is very real but will take/has taken a backseat to the business.
That would be great. Unfortunately as soon as governments get more money they will spend it which makes it increasingly harder to spend less.
Sure, not claiming it is the same category. Just the sentiment of "it's just taking a little from the rich so it won't hurt" is similar. The main emotional motivator behind both is to take from the rich.
I honestly don't see how this outcome isn't all but guaranteed. It is actually almost comically self-destructive. Taxes based on the same idea of (just take a bit from the rich) destroyed the Swedish financial markets…
It depends on the day and how honest people feel. If it were truly about numbers they would probably find more success in getting their government to spend smarter.
I am just amazed at how many people are blind to this. Every single time one of these labs does something it is almost always sensationalized. They absolutely cannot refrain from describing how incredible their models…
Sorry for the late reply. If I look in the "Library" at images I have generated, scroll down a bit and click the image, all the images turn black/empty, that image then shifts to the top of the page. Putting it at the…
> Didn't this exact scenario just happen like 3 months ago with Instagram? Hey now, they probably paid millions of tokens to ship that feature.
Not sure I can agree, but the idea is interesting. While the set is finite, software comes and goes. Just look at the tools to build software over the years. > Many software firms have been allowed to bloat up do to the…
I can't even go a day without running into super frustrating bugs on the ChatGPT app.