It is a perfectly adequate paper trail. It's much easier to check in a postmortem than shouting something across the desk. Like code review, because you know your approval will be recorded irrevocably, you just think it…
Someone says 'about to push this potentially breaking change to a shared resource, is that ok?'. Then everyone else posts a :thumbsup: Obviously, this could be done differently. But it's easy to do it like this and come…
would you like a scoop of icecream with the cake?
Facebook and Google both know that you are married to your wife. Facebook because of Facebook and Google because of Gmail. The use of your social graph to gather data is pretty well telegraphed by both these companies.
That would be a good way to prove that FB do this. But it wouldn't work to disprove it. Presumably neither the lack of whistleblowers nor a whistleblower who claims "We definitely don't do this" would convince people.
I see too many of these. Write code to simulate something and obtain an inconclusive version of a result you can simply derive and prove definitively using statistics.
It seems like there was a mismatch in expectations that goes to the heart of how universities and philanthropy work. The university thought it was getting a donation, along with some vanity conditions, comparable to…
It is a perfectly adequate paper trail. It's much easier to check in a postmortem than shouting something across the desk. Like code review, because you know your approval will be recorded irrevocably, you just think it…
Someone says 'about to push this potentially breaking change to a shared resource, is that ok?'. Then everyone else posts a :thumbsup: Obviously, this could be done differently. But it's easy to do it like this and come…
would you like a scoop of icecream with the cake?
Facebook and Google both know that you are married to your wife. Facebook because of Facebook and Google because of Gmail. The use of your social graph to gather data is pretty well telegraphed by both these companies.
That would be a good way to prove that FB do this. But it wouldn't work to disprove it. Presumably neither the lack of whistleblowers nor a whistleblower who claims "We definitely don't do this" would convince people.
I see too many of these. Write code to simulate something and obtain an inconclusive version of a result you can simply derive and prove definitively using statistics.
It seems like there was a mismatch in expectations that goes to the heart of how universities and philanthropy work. The university thought it was getting a donation, along with some vanity conditions, comparable to…