In reality it often means these systems are built in bad, ineffective way. Most likely in bad, ineffective languages/technologies. You don't need 17 years to be able to contribute to Apache Spark. You would not call…
Good to them finally giving UX a serious thought, as well as using multicore and adding flatpak installation method. At least opensource affocinados stand some semblance of chance in PS/LR holywar.
Let's hope this will finally change the "compatibility with py3 is a feature" to "no py3 compatibility - no library" state of things. It's really surprising how stubborn some teams are.
Yep. What this situation shows is that open data is faaaar faaaar worse represented than open source. There is not even a faint whisper of possibility, you know, not using proprietary platform and use the internet the…
YOLO, people from IBM and Apple chiming in to preach about business decency. Now I've seen everything.
It's rather cute to so naively believe such practices can be maintained.
In reality it often means these systems are built in bad, ineffective way. Most likely in bad, ineffective languages/technologies. You don't need 17 years to be able to contribute to Apache Spark. You would not call…
Good to them finally giving UX a serious thought, as well as using multicore and adding flatpak installation method. At least opensource affocinados stand some semblance of chance in PS/LR holywar.
Let's hope this will finally change the "compatibility with py3 is a feature" to "no py3 compatibility - no library" state of things. It's really surprising how stubborn some teams are.
Yep. What this situation shows is that open data is faaaar faaaar worse represented than open source. There is not even a faint whisper of possibility, you know, not using proprietary platform and use the internet the…
YOLO, people from IBM and Apple chiming in to preach about business decency. Now I've seen everything.
It's rather cute to so naively believe such practices can be maintained.