That would be excusable for a generation of macbooks. Not over multiple generations.
I hope so. I just see Apple going down the same dark path they used to before the M series laptops.
TBH this is one of the things that will be a clear downgrade imo. Weight reductions are thinness are not free. The Pro and Max chip version are already over powered for the cooling system the current macbook pros have.…
Very worried to see it's 1mm thinner. The existing macbook pro was already struggling way too much with heat. And now the shave off 1mm.
Calling it something extremely negative like a cattle pen makes clear that you aren't even open to consider anything but the negatives.
You can do that? You have a million people ready to go? Whereas a singular person on a rich country salary can actually go out and start vast amounts of agents. I'm honestly perplexed by your argument. Most people would…
Well not really. The point is "There are some things that are sped up by a very large factor, easily over 1000000x.", this is obviously referring to wall clock time. Not "agent time". Yes companies/large groups of…
I don't think you are supposed to multiple the number of agents with the time. After all a single human can run arbitrary number of agents. Still 1000000x speedup is a few order of magnitude too many imo.
That's moving the goal post. I was responding to this line in your comment: > so turning over control to AI companies where no human ever sees the patient is a no brainer Using an open weight model turns no control over…
I'm not sure what AI companies have to do with it. Open weight models are available and work great, literally today kimi K3.1 pro was announced and it on part with Fable 5.1. You are tying AI usage to bigAI and that is…
I think it won't happen because people just care to much for performance. You already see this now. You see a ton of rewrites moving to rust even from higher level languages.
People are really not as black and white as you are making them out to be. Most coders cared both about writing the code and the end result.
Of course, and then AI will give you generic canned things to build. It cannot (yet) read minds. I don't understand what you wanted to make clear to me with this.
We are not talking about MVP, we are talking about finished products. Each of those can be done by a single person now in weeks. Before it was years.
I think one form of cognitive labor will remain: What do we actually want to do/build. And this is simply because AI does not know our internal world. Maybe in a few years with some kind of BCI that is extremely good.…
Yes, because someone who is so dedicated they make a throwaway account to bash Musk is someone whose mind is open to be changed.
I don't get it. Musk has an insane track record of shipping things. Well usually later then he claimed but he gets it done.
I see this sentiment a lot more recently and I don't understand it. Why is it "backhanded" if someone uses AI to create something. I don't see the connection with ease of creation either.
I certainly would not appreciate hourly crashes, don't get me wrong. But inconstant frame pacing makes me queasy.
It depends a lot on the person I guess. But I'd gladly trade, let's say hourly crashes, for great frametimes.
Not it doesn't. Video games are simply pure functions list[inputs] -> list[output]. Where the input are HID and the outputs are video and audio, and in some cases stuff like rumble. The equivalence suite can treat the…
I would love to see them come up with this. And I will gladly await AI to smash through it in short order.
That's not a definition, that's a gut feeling.
I have heard that before, it's essentially the LLM cannot be creative packaged differently. But it always falls flat because there is just no way to measure it let alone define it. In the end it always give me a vibe of…
You have the model play both versions of the game in the same way at the same time. The equality would of course not come from the model, it comes from your testing harness. You just use the model to automatically play…
That would be excusable for a generation of macbooks. Not over multiple generations.
I hope so. I just see Apple going down the same dark path they used to before the M series laptops.
TBH this is one of the things that will be a clear downgrade imo. Weight reductions are thinness are not free. The Pro and Max chip version are already over powered for the cooling system the current macbook pros have.…
Very worried to see it's 1mm thinner. The existing macbook pro was already struggling way too much with heat. And now the shave off 1mm.
Calling it something extremely negative like a cattle pen makes clear that you aren't even open to consider anything but the negatives.
You can do that? You have a million people ready to go? Whereas a singular person on a rich country salary can actually go out and start vast amounts of agents. I'm honestly perplexed by your argument. Most people would…
Well not really. The point is "There are some things that are sped up by a very large factor, easily over 1000000x.", this is obviously referring to wall clock time. Not "agent time". Yes companies/large groups of…
I don't think you are supposed to multiple the number of agents with the time. After all a single human can run arbitrary number of agents. Still 1000000x speedup is a few order of magnitude too many imo.
That's moving the goal post. I was responding to this line in your comment: > so turning over control to AI companies where no human ever sees the patient is a no brainer Using an open weight model turns no control over…
I'm not sure what AI companies have to do with it. Open weight models are available and work great, literally today kimi K3.1 pro was announced and it on part with Fable 5.1. You are tying AI usage to bigAI and that is…
I think it won't happen because people just care to much for performance. You already see this now. You see a ton of rewrites moving to rust even from higher level languages.
People are really not as black and white as you are making them out to be. Most coders cared both about writing the code and the end result.
Of course, and then AI will give you generic canned things to build. It cannot (yet) read minds. I don't understand what you wanted to make clear to me with this.
We are not talking about MVP, we are talking about finished products. Each of those can be done by a single person now in weeks. Before it was years.
I think one form of cognitive labor will remain: What do we actually want to do/build. And this is simply because AI does not know our internal world. Maybe in a few years with some kind of BCI that is extremely good.…
Yes, because someone who is so dedicated they make a throwaway account to bash Musk is someone whose mind is open to be changed.
I don't get it. Musk has an insane track record of shipping things. Well usually later then he claimed but he gets it done.
I see this sentiment a lot more recently and I don't understand it. Why is it "backhanded" if someone uses AI to create something. I don't see the connection with ease of creation either.
I certainly would not appreciate hourly crashes, don't get me wrong. But inconstant frame pacing makes me queasy.
It depends a lot on the person I guess. But I'd gladly trade, let's say hourly crashes, for great frametimes.
Not it doesn't. Video games are simply pure functions list[inputs] -> list[output]. Where the input are HID and the outputs are video and audio, and in some cases stuff like rumble. The equivalence suite can treat the…
I would love to see them come up with this. And I will gladly await AI to smash through it in short order.
That's not a definition, that's a gut feeling.
I have heard that before, it's essentially the LLM cannot be creative packaged differently. But it always falls flat because there is just no way to measure it let alone define it. In the end it always give me a vibe of…
You have the model play both versions of the game in the same way at the same time. The equality would of course not come from the model, it comes from your testing harness. You just use the model to automatically play…