They want people with money to be the only people good at the games. The playing field will be: hours producing skill where skill is now weighted towards having more money because that’s how you get hours now. Weird…
I wonder about our innate desire to want glory :/
Understanding details is not the same as truly caring about the solution, and never will be.
Just give me the solution to the problem of Lack of care to understand the details by people who can actually make a difference.
This kind of thinking pattern scares me because I know some honest people have not been afforded an honest shot at a working romantic relationship.
I think openai chatgpt is probably excellently positioned to perfectly _satisfy_. Is that what everyone is looking for?
Propaganda is mostly without Science. This is with.
It’s so much more convincing with a device though. Backed by scientific consensus. Where do I leave my brain and offload my judgment effort and let it tell me what i need to know about anyone
I think the real danger lies in how many will accept that output as the unadulterated unmistakable truth for actions, for judgment. Talk about a sinister device.
Amazing how strong sound logic and reason can continue to be
Thanks for this clarification.
They want people with money to be the only people good at the games. The playing field will be: hours producing skill where skill is now weighted towards having more money because that’s how you get hours now. Weird…
I wonder about our innate desire to want glory :/
Understanding details is not the same as truly caring about the solution, and never will be.
Just give me the solution to the problem of Lack of care to understand the details by people who can actually make a difference.
This kind of thinking pattern scares me because I know some honest people have not been afforded an honest shot at a working romantic relationship.
I think openai chatgpt is probably excellently positioned to perfectly _satisfy_. Is that what everyone is looking for?
Propaganda is mostly without Science. This is with.
It’s so much more convincing with a device though. Backed by scientific consensus. Where do I leave my brain and offload my judgment effort and let it tell me what i need to know about anyone
I think the real danger lies in how many will accept that output as the unadulterated unmistakable truth for actions, for judgment. Talk about a sinister device.
Amazing how strong sound logic and reason can continue to be
Thanks for this clarification.