Of course it's possible. What you're probably going to see is increasing cost to keep a dedicated public IPv4 address. If you don't, you will probably either have to have IPv6 or NAT. Residential will probably lose…
In this case, it's not the shell that's the problem, it's ssh's command line argument parsing that you need to be careful with.
From a quick peek at their announcements from long ago, it looks like they used to run 64MB as the smallest size, but this was, of course, back in 2003/2004. Until 2008 or 2009, they were also still using UML, instead…
Of course it's possible. What you're probably going to see is increasing cost to keep a dedicated public IPv4 address. If you don't, you will probably either have to have IPv6 or NAT. Residential will probably lose…
In this case, it's not the shell that's the problem, it's ssh's command line argument parsing that you need to be careful with.
From a quick peek at their announcements from long ago, it looks like they used to run 64MB as the smallest size, but this was, of course, back in 2003/2004. Until 2008 or 2009, they were also still using UML, instead…