Then laugh at the tragedy of your impending genetic extinction.
What ought to be is what benefits the tribe. More people benefit the tribe, because you then have expendable males that can be used to pillage the neighboring tribes. Unless you have depleted the environment (e.g.,…
"We also spent millennia believing the earth is flat" How does that even translate into more or less births? Yet, avoiding putting women in risky jobs (e.g., hunting) does translate into lower mortality rates for…
Sure, provided that the long-term consequences of her actions are carefully discussed.
Laugh all you want. Your kind is being outbred.
Appeals to nature are suspect, appeals to the irrelevancy of nature are outright dishonest.
Men cannot give birth, so they are more expendable and are given risky tasks, like hunting and protecting the tribe from other tribes. The average 20 year old woman is much more valuable than the average 20 year old man.
Perhaps a few decades from now, saner people will arrive at the realization that a woman's first career should be motherhood. A woman's best years should be for her children, not her employer.
That is as valid as creationism. Please abstain from such worthless platitudinous statements.
"... or the wife works while the man take care of kids" Then wifey starts seeing hubby as a sexless entity --- sort of like the son she never gave birth to --- and loses attraction for him. "... it isn't a gender thing.…
The phenomenon is way too recent. A few more decades of this, and let's see.
It is safe to assume that people with non-trivial power are very seldom sincere when making public statements. If Dubai's elite's descendants will be riding camels some decades from now, then why does Dubai have a…
That is a matter of wealth preservation. What about wealth creation? How much Saudi wealth is there without stability and security? Also, why should all children inherit equally? Marry the daughters into wealth, and…
Proof? How do you prove someone is being sincere?
Quoting Samuelson, if a man marries his maid, the GDP goes down. That is how smart GDP-based arguments are. Wait until the population gets close to the carrying capacity again, and let's see how your GDP argument holds.…
> Be careful to not reproduce in excess Or, alternatively, reproduce abundantly and use your children to make alliances with families that actually do matter. You're advocating having few children in a thread related to…
Just because he said that, it does not mean he believes in it. It's feel-good baloney.
You're living in a fantasy world in which people you admire matter. Try to make fertilizers out of "hi-tech services". Try to eat "renewables". Inventors, scientists and engineers haven't really mattered much since WWII…
> Presidential elections in the US are always and only won by the candidates who spend the most money. Did Trump outspend Rodham?
> What's the connection between this solution and string theory? Which string theory? The one in physics or the one in computer science?
Then laugh at the tragedy of your impending genetic extinction.
What ought to be is what benefits the tribe. More people benefit the tribe, because you then have expendable males that can be used to pillage the neighboring tribes. Unless you have depleted the environment (e.g.,…
"We also spent millennia believing the earth is flat" How does that even translate into more or less births? Yet, avoiding putting women in risky jobs (e.g., hunting) does translate into lower mortality rates for…
Sure, provided that the long-term consequences of her actions are carefully discussed.
Laugh all you want. Your kind is being outbred.
Appeals to nature are suspect, appeals to the irrelevancy of nature are outright dishonest.
Men cannot give birth, so they are more expendable and are given risky tasks, like hunting and protecting the tribe from other tribes. The average 20 year old woman is much more valuable than the average 20 year old man.
Perhaps a few decades from now, saner people will arrive at the realization that a woman's first career should be motherhood. A woman's best years should be for her children, not her employer.
That is as valid as creationism. Please abstain from such worthless platitudinous statements.
"... or the wife works while the man take care of kids" Then wifey starts seeing hubby as a sexless entity --- sort of like the son she never gave birth to --- and loses attraction for him. "... it isn't a gender thing.…
The phenomenon is way too recent. A few more decades of this, and let's see.
It is safe to assume that people with non-trivial power are very seldom sincere when making public statements. If Dubai's elite's descendants will be riding camels some decades from now, then why does Dubai have a…
That is a matter of wealth preservation. What about wealth creation? How much Saudi wealth is there without stability and security? Also, why should all children inherit equally? Marry the daughters into wealth, and…
Proof? How do you prove someone is being sincere?
Quoting Samuelson, if a man marries his maid, the GDP goes down. That is how smart GDP-based arguments are. Wait until the population gets close to the carrying capacity again, and let's see how your GDP argument holds.…
> Be careful to not reproduce in excess Or, alternatively, reproduce abundantly and use your children to make alliances with families that actually do matter. You're advocating having few children in a thread related to…
Just because he said that, it does not mean he believes in it. It's feel-good baloney.
You're living in a fantasy world in which people you admire matter. Try to make fertilizers out of "hi-tech services". Try to eat "renewables". Inventors, scientists and engineers haven't really mattered much since WWII…
> Presidential elections in the US are always and only won by the candidates who spend the most money. Did Trump outspend Rodham?
> What's the connection between this solution and string theory? Which string theory? The one in physics or the one in computer science?