Interestingly that linux kernel does not have caps for cpu in terms of instructions.
quote "don't give advice unless asked" it is not you! i think most of the people feel the same way. at least i do i suspect that in your case a review is mandatory as well as fixing its comments. from my perspective a…
> 2) languages such as PL/SQL are much poorer than any modern programming language true but it is for a reason. For example you can replace/upgrade any piece of code on the running system transactionally. But in a…
many say that git has an intuitive/concise data model. But it seems that even git team itself has not quite got it. Looking at one of the latest changes [1] in which a _new_ merge strategy (ort) was introduced and made…
have been wondering for a while why HFTs exist when exchanges have holidays and trading hours [1]? doesn't the sub-milisecond speed contradict to the several hours pause in trading? wouldn't be possible to impose some…
Erlang
before the change CREATE TABLE the_table (was_char CHAR); CREATE VIEW table_read_api AS SELECT was_char FROM the_table; a client consumes data via: select was_char from table_read_api; after the change alter table…
a view would allow you to change a field's type. something like this CREATE VIEW table_read_api AS SELECT TO_CHAR(now_int) as was_char FROM the_table; not sure that the view is an internal structure because it will be…
what if we put the table behind a view? would it be count as a communication via API?
> which is going on the opposite direction as you would expect. It looks like a bug which should be fixed. Git should create a merge commit when it sees that "the direction" changes.
Interestingly that linux kernel does not have caps for cpu in terms of instructions.
quote "don't give advice unless asked" it is not you! i think most of the people feel the same way. at least i do i suspect that in your case a review is mandatory as well as fixing its comments. from my perspective a…
> 2) languages such as PL/SQL are much poorer than any modern programming language true but it is for a reason. For example you can replace/upgrade any piece of code on the running system transactionally. But in a…
many say that git has an intuitive/concise data model. But it seems that even git team itself has not quite got it. Looking at one of the latest changes [1] in which a _new_ merge strategy (ort) was introduced and made…
have been wondering for a while why HFTs exist when exchanges have holidays and trading hours [1]? doesn't the sub-milisecond speed contradict to the several hours pause in trading? wouldn't be possible to impose some…
Erlang
before the change CREATE TABLE the_table (was_char CHAR); CREATE VIEW table_read_api AS SELECT was_char FROM the_table; a client consumes data via: select was_char from table_read_api; after the change alter table…
a view would allow you to change a field's type. something like this CREATE VIEW table_read_api AS SELECT TO_CHAR(now_int) as was_char FROM the_table; not sure that the view is an internal structure because it will be…
what if we put the table behind a view? would it be count as a communication via API?
> which is going on the opposite direction as you would expect. It looks like a bug which should be fixed. Git should create a merge commit when it sees that "the direction" changes.