Wait, one of the things I've heard about Facebook is that there is almost no change control. Especially on the mobile app side, that people just add code to the app without any real oversight, which is why it's grown to…
Are you actually writing an implementation of Java? No? Then it shouldn't affect you.
Which are usually supported by having 7 tracking libraries and 3 ad brokers in the app. And having a bunch of free apps doesn't really make the ecosystem appeal to developers who want to eat.
I think it's more that there are more hobbyist developers on Android, whereas iOS developers are trying to make a business out of it.
It very well can. However, unless they absolutely have to, the company is not going to pass those on to customers. Think of it: If you could save 5 cents per part, and you didn't have to pass that savings onto anyone,…
CEOs are the ones who make the decisions on what kind of stock program to implement.
Some are, some aren't. Some are run by charities and churches, some by private companies. Many of these, especially ones in smaller, more rural communities, will receive government funds to help provide services.
Unless it's going to take a really long time, don't tell the boss it needs to be refactored; just do it.
"As for the actual device itself: why would I buy it with the remote, subscriptions, dongles, etc. when I could buy an HDMI cable and use my laptop's "apps" instead? Is Apple trying to create an app ecosystem with the…
You're assuming the proxy fee would be enough to appease the content creators, and that it would make up for lost deals in other countries.
It's not documented or in the public headers. Meaning you do have to do a bit of fiddling in your app, but that just amounts to using reflection to use the API. Just because an API is private doesn't mean it's…
Except what would f.lux add on top of what Apple has released? It seems like Apple already did all the work.
Irrelevant. We're talking about people who feel entitled to the work of others just taking it.
And that entitles you to just take it? Again, why should anyone pay you for the work you do if that's what you believe?
No, nobody is "entitled" to access to content.
No, because part of the reason for the crackdown is due to the content creators. It's not Netflix not wanting to serve people who are using proxies.
Why do you feel so entitled to the work of others?
Except that is not the case, and your statement is nothing more than worthless hyperbole.
Jesus Christ you people are such entitled little snots. With attitudes like that, why should anyone pay for the hard work you do?
Emotional experience does NOT trump usability. Period.
Another 3 seconds will reveal that your thinking is similar to the justification used for spending public money on stadiums, and giving tax breaks for movie filming. Both of which have been proven to have negative…
Forbid them from giving sweetheart tax deals. Which is NOT forbidding them from attracting employers.
There's the added costs for those additional people in terms of traffic congestion, schools, and other services. There's also the lack of a guarantee that GE will stay long enough, or that they won't demand an even…
"I'm not advocating that states should race to the bottom, but they should race to the bottom." If a state is competitive, then it should be able to be competitive without giving away sweetheart tax deals.
So? Couldn't one say that about any large company? Should states be constantly cutting taxes for these large companies, and shoving them onto the people who live there now?
Wait, one of the things I've heard about Facebook is that there is almost no change control. Especially on the mobile app side, that people just add code to the app without any real oversight, which is why it's grown to…
Are you actually writing an implementation of Java? No? Then it shouldn't affect you.
Which are usually supported by having 7 tracking libraries and 3 ad brokers in the app. And having a bunch of free apps doesn't really make the ecosystem appeal to developers who want to eat.
I think it's more that there are more hobbyist developers on Android, whereas iOS developers are trying to make a business out of it.
It very well can. However, unless they absolutely have to, the company is not going to pass those on to customers. Think of it: If you could save 5 cents per part, and you didn't have to pass that savings onto anyone,…
CEOs are the ones who make the decisions on what kind of stock program to implement.
Some are, some aren't. Some are run by charities and churches, some by private companies. Many of these, especially ones in smaller, more rural communities, will receive government funds to help provide services.
Unless it's going to take a really long time, don't tell the boss it needs to be refactored; just do it.
"As for the actual device itself: why would I buy it with the remote, subscriptions, dongles, etc. when I could buy an HDMI cable and use my laptop's "apps" instead? Is Apple trying to create an app ecosystem with the…
You're assuming the proxy fee would be enough to appease the content creators, and that it would make up for lost deals in other countries.
It's not documented or in the public headers. Meaning you do have to do a bit of fiddling in your app, but that just amounts to using reflection to use the API. Just because an API is private doesn't mean it's…
Except what would f.lux add on top of what Apple has released? It seems like Apple already did all the work.
Irrelevant. We're talking about people who feel entitled to the work of others just taking it.
And that entitles you to just take it? Again, why should anyone pay you for the work you do if that's what you believe?
No, nobody is "entitled" to access to content.
No, because part of the reason for the crackdown is due to the content creators. It's not Netflix not wanting to serve people who are using proxies.
Why do you feel so entitled to the work of others?
Except that is not the case, and your statement is nothing more than worthless hyperbole.
Jesus Christ you people are such entitled little snots. With attitudes like that, why should anyone pay for the hard work you do?
Emotional experience does NOT trump usability. Period.
Another 3 seconds will reveal that your thinking is similar to the justification used for spending public money on stadiums, and giving tax breaks for movie filming. Both of which have been proven to have negative…
Forbid them from giving sweetheart tax deals. Which is NOT forbidding them from attracting employers.
There's the added costs for those additional people in terms of traffic congestion, schools, and other services. There's also the lack of a guarantee that GE will stay long enough, or that they won't demand an even…
"I'm not advocating that states should race to the bottom, but they should race to the bottom." If a state is competitive, then it should be able to be competitive without giving away sweetheart tax deals.
So? Couldn't one say that about any large company? Should states be constantly cutting taxes for these large companies, and shoving them onto the people who live there now?