I would not be surprised if what happened here is that Apple had hardware to release this week and needed to get 27.2 out the door with support for them, and it was "too late" to merge in the certificate store changes.…
XProtect removes malware, not certificates
Yes because that thing is completely useless and provides basically no value
Yes: https://support.apple.com/en-us/149555
This isn't technical documentation though, it's just notes the agents are keeping for each other. I think that is a very different task
> iPhone 16 Mini I wish
I assume having a person write words for other people to read is not feasible?
You should make another index is my point. The database layer properly implements this extra index instead of just being a stupid dictionary that you have to massage with the one key value you have
Running an internet forum does not make you better or less impartial at commenting
Let's also try to figure out if smoking causes cancer, yes.
I don't actually care that much for Grok the model because I think they are more or less homogenous with like, a small house spin on how "smart" they are and some other features like their behavior in a harness etc.…
If you were a little slower to jump to conclusions you might see that the blog post does not actually make the elementary blunder of not understanding how Rice's Theorem works, and that the claims made are qualified…
What is the intended goal of this website? The doctor told you smoking is bad so you're going to give your child a pack a day and see if they die by age 20? If they don't, obviously, your doctor is a quack who cries…
No, the claims they made are well supported.
I don't really know what to tell you but the comments are definitely Claude. The result is pretty good but AI was definitely involved in the creation of this.
Sure but at least you are being honest about it. For what it's worth the database can handle this internally without you needing to hand this back but if you have a bad one then yes you should probably have it give you…
Yes, which means that you should probably be able to provide your timestamp to the database so it can use it for optimizing its index, rather than trying to shove it in your ID
Implemented, sure. Conceived of? Probably a human was involved somewhere
The code comments are pretty clear tells
This very much sounds like databases do not, in fact, support indexing on more than one thing at once.
You can see that the blog post does not claim to solve the halting problem; instead, they pick a subset of behavior that is likely to be useful.
That is the goal of physics presumably
They're using Rocq
Agents can't really reliably prove things (at least not cheaply) hence the desire to chain together tools that can be checked.
Sounds like the problem here is that databases need to index on more than one thing at once
I would not be surprised if what happened here is that Apple had hardware to release this week and needed to get 27.2 out the door with support for them, and it was "too late" to merge in the certificate store changes.…
XProtect removes malware, not certificates
Yes because that thing is completely useless and provides basically no value
Yes: https://support.apple.com/en-us/149555
This isn't technical documentation though, it's just notes the agents are keeping for each other. I think that is a very different task
> iPhone 16 Mini I wish
I assume having a person write words for other people to read is not feasible?
You should make another index is my point. The database layer properly implements this extra index instead of just being a stupid dictionary that you have to massage with the one key value you have
Running an internet forum does not make you better or less impartial at commenting
Let's also try to figure out if smoking causes cancer, yes.
I don't actually care that much for Grok the model because I think they are more or less homogenous with like, a small house spin on how "smart" they are and some other features like their behavior in a harness etc.…
If you were a little slower to jump to conclusions you might see that the blog post does not actually make the elementary blunder of not understanding how Rice's Theorem works, and that the claims made are qualified…
What is the intended goal of this website? The doctor told you smoking is bad so you're going to give your child a pack a day and see if they die by age 20? If they don't, obviously, your doctor is a quack who cries…
No, the claims they made are well supported.
I don't really know what to tell you but the comments are definitely Claude. The result is pretty good but AI was definitely involved in the creation of this.
Sure but at least you are being honest about it. For what it's worth the database can handle this internally without you needing to hand this back but if you have a bad one then yes you should probably have it give you…
Yes, which means that you should probably be able to provide your timestamp to the database so it can use it for optimizing its index, rather than trying to shove it in your ID
Implemented, sure. Conceived of? Probably a human was involved somewhere
The code comments are pretty clear tells
This very much sounds like databases do not, in fact, support indexing on more than one thing at once.
You can see that the blog post does not claim to solve the halting problem; instead, they pick a subset of behavior that is likely to be useful.
That is the goal of physics presumably
They're using Rocq
Agents can't really reliably prove things (at least not cheaply) hence the desire to chain together tools that can be checked.
Sounds like the problem here is that databases need to index on more than one thing at once