First of all, when I said concrete things I did not mean for example theoretical physics concepts. I mean things like economics[0] or philosophy[1]. I am saying that mathematical abstraction is not the right tool to get…
As a mathematician, usually I find attempts to apply abstract mathematical concepts to concrete real-world concepts clumsy and hurting both the abstraction and the concrete thing. Is this the case with this text?
First of all, when I said concrete things I did not mean for example theoretical physics concepts. I mean things like economics[0] or philosophy[1]. I am saying that mathematical abstraction is not the right tool to get…
As a mathematician, usually I find attempts to apply abstract mathematical concepts to concrete real-world concepts clumsy and hurting both the abstraction and the concrete thing. Is this the case with this text?