Radar/DFS is a whole other can of worms. My rules of thumb for DFS: (1) If you can use a DFS channel - use it. it's usually less congested than the regular channels (2) If you're unlucky and DFS is triggered once per…
160MHz channels are a rarity even today, neither the latest Samsung S10 nor the latest iPhone support 160MHz. Much more common is 80MHz channel, and even then, there is a distinction between the "main" 40MHz and the…
I agree. "Mesh node" with wire backhaul is good and usually solves the seamless roaming issue (YMMV, check before you buy).
That's no snark. If she can reliably demonstrate sensitivity to -60dBm RF signals (nanoWatts - the typical received signal strength of a Wi-Fi signal), that's the equivalent of having discovered a new human sense on top…
Thus recommendation #1 - Use 5GHz only. 5GHz propagation across walls is much worse than 2.4GHz propagation, therefore only nearby neighbors may interfere with your access point, and on 5GHz there are enough…
> definitely she does. That's not scientific. That's not a double-blind experiment. Your may be more attentive to her mentions when you've secretely switched on the wifi. You may behaving differently and she may be…
Wireless is OK, you just need to use it correctly. The trick is to treat it as a cellular system, and use the same methodology used to build cellular networks: (1) Use only 5GHz for Wi-Fi. Turn off 2.4GHz WiFi - it's an…
Radar/DFS is a whole other can of worms. My rules of thumb for DFS: (1) If you can use a DFS channel - use it. it's usually less congested than the regular channels (2) If you're unlucky and DFS is triggered once per…
160MHz channels are a rarity even today, neither the latest Samsung S10 nor the latest iPhone support 160MHz. Much more common is 80MHz channel, and even then, there is a distinction between the "main" 40MHz and the…
I agree. "Mesh node" with wire backhaul is good and usually solves the seamless roaming issue (YMMV, check before you buy).
That's no snark. If she can reliably demonstrate sensitivity to -60dBm RF signals (nanoWatts - the typical received signal strength of a Wi-Fi signal), that's the equivalent of having discovered a new human sense on top…
Thus recommendation #1 - Use 5GHz only. 5GHz propagation across walls is much worse than 2.4GHz propagation, therefore only nearby neighbors may interfere with your access point, and on 5GHz there are enough…
> definitely she does. That's not scientific. That's not a double-blind experiment. Your may be more attentive to her mentions when you've secretely switched on the wifi. You may behaving differently and she may be…
Wireless is OK, you just need to use it correctly. The trick is to treat it as a cellular system, and use the same methodology used to build cellular networks: (1) Use only 5GHz for Wi-Fi. Turn off 2.4GHz WiFi - it's an…