If I understand this correctly, calling it a "digital model" would be more appropriate. Digital twins require sensor input from a real system as well as the ability to alter the real system, not just prediction.
I've started substituting "human" for "LLM" when I read posts like these. Is having 7 different humans analyzing the same code base any less wasteful?
The general negativity toward agents makes it read like the problem section of a research proposal ("X isn't good enough, we're going to develop solution Y").
If I understand this correctly, calling it a "digital model" would be more appropriate. Digital twins require sensor input from a real system as well as the ability to alter the real system, not just prediction.
I've started substituting "human" for "LLM" when I read posts like these. Is having 7 different humans analyzing the same code base any less wasteful?
The general negativity toward agents makes it read like the problem section of a research proposal ("X isn't good enough, we're going to develop solution Y").