> I'm a very technical person, and I honestly don't think I'd ever heard of it. > CAN is obscure enough that I’d never heard of it. These types of statements are why I said “insist”. There is really is almost no way to…
And the exact same thing can be said about “Java” or in this instance “Python” or any other jargon. Why does no one ask for those terms highlighted? All technical documentation is not a Wikipedia article. It’s just not…
If you saw a library for say Image Processing or cattle husbandry for Java/JVM would you insist that the project provide a description of “Java”? I’m going to guess if you’re being honest you’d say no. CAN really is not…
> I'm a very technical person, and I honestly don't think I'd ever heard of it. > CAN is obscure enough that I’d never heard of it. These types of statements are why I said “insist”. There is really is almost no way to…
And the exact same thing can be said about “Java” or in this instance “Python” or any other jargon. Why does no one ask for those terms highlighted? All technical documentation is not a Wikipedia article. It’s just not…
If you saw a library for say Image Processing or cattle husbandry for Java/JVM would you insist that the project provide a description of “Java”? I’m going to guess if you’re being honest you’d say no. CAN really is not…