Can you give examples? "Perhaps these rules are in place because the people creating the rules know that rank and file have no bargaining power and cannot advocate for a less draconian system without fear of…
All those things are partially socialism. Simply instating minimum wage laws doesn't make a country fully socialist, but it is a puzzle piece. It means the wage is not set by the market anymore, but by a committee.
I know that the rules exist, so I can assign a highly likelihood for there to be a reason for the rules to exist. Also I have read the one or other thing.
It's a nice thought. But where would all the unreliable people work then? Or you think they would just become reliable if they would get paid more? That seems unlikely to me. There are unreliable rich people, too.…
"I doubt there are enough of them, even in Amazon’s warehouses, to warrant the draconian rules for all employees." So why do you think those rules exist? Because Amazon managers simply are bad people who like to torture…
Because he was fired for refusing to comply to the orders of his employer. Whether they seemed reasonable or not. And he seems to have switched from worrying about his safety to campaigning against Amazon. Why should…
Nevertheless, he contradicted the orders of his employers, which seems a good reason for being fired. (Edit, in response to the answer below: I doubt sending somebody home to be quarantined violates any laws).
That's why people work hard to acquire skills, to be able to work in better jobs. I have never run a warehouse, but I suspect that many of the strange seeming rules are in place because people otherwise try to exploit…
Nevertheless, he was quarantined and came to work. Why?
What is so bad about treating somebody as someone who can pick and pack your parcels? It's just a job? And what does it have to do with Capitalism. You think under Socialism they would care about your individuality? No…
"This data, known as “CVVs” in the cybercrime underground, is sold in packages for about $15 to $20 per record" Would it be terribly complicated to make single use credit cards? Like if you have an app from your bank…
For email I just use the email plan that comes with my very cheap blog hosting plan.
Shouldn't they simply curb the (alleged) tax evasions then?
Sure - but even then, how can such a policy be justified. They can not claim it is for the benefit of the people.
"In my case, I am willing to pay more to the local shop if everybody is doing it. If Im the only one, the benefit is lost but I personally pay the cost." But a significant number of people should be wanting to do it -…
I don't understand that kind of thing: the government is presumably elected by the people. Why would the people want the government to fight a business that they could voluntarily avoid, without any government…
I wonder if it could be possible to mix test samples to test several people at once? Like maybe take 10 or even 100 samples, mix them together, and the test shows positive if any of the 100 has the disease? In that…
Can you give examples? "Perhaps these rules are in place because the people creating the rules know that rank and file have no bargaining power and cannot advocate for a less draconian system without fear of…
All those things are partially socialism. Simply instating minimum wage laws doesn't make a country fully socialist, but it is a puzzle piece. It means the wage is not set by the market anymore, but by a committee.
I know that the rules exist, so I can assign a highly likelihood for there to be a reason for the rules to exist. Also I have read the one or other thing.
It's a nice thought. But where would all the unreliable people work then? Or you think they would just become reliable if they would get paid more? That seems unlikely to me. There are unreliable rich people, too.…
"I doubt there are enough of them, even in Amazon’s warehouses, to warrant the draconian rules for all employees." So why do you think those rules exist? Because Amazon managers simply are bad people who like to torture…
Because he was fired for refusing to comply to the orders of his employer. Whether they seemed reasonable or not. And he seems to have switched from worrying about his safety to campaigning against Amazon. Why should…
Nevertheless, he contradicted the orders of his employers, which seems a good reason for being fired. (Edit, in response to the answer below: I doubt sending somebody home to be quarantined violates any laws).
That's why people work hard to acquire skills, to be able to work in better jobs. I have never run a warehouse, but I suspect that many of the strange seeming rules are in place because people otherwise try to exploit…
Nevertheless, he was quarantined and came to work. Why?
What is so bad about treating somebody as someone who can pick and pack your parcels? It's just a job? And what does it have to do with Capitalism. You think under Socialism they would care about your individuality? No…
"This data, known as “CVVs” in the cybercrime underground, is sold in packages for about $15 to $20 per record" Would it be terribly complicated to make single use credit cards? Like if you have an app from your bank…
For email I just use the email plan that comes with my very cheap blog hosting plan.
Shouldn't they simply curb the (alleged) tax evasions then?
Sure - but even then, how can such a policy be justified. They can not claim it is for the benefit of the people.
"In my case, I am willing to pay more to the local shop if everybody is doing it. If Im the only one, the benefit is lost but I personally pay the cost." But a significant number of people should be wanting to do it -…
I don't understand that kind of thing: the government is presumably elected by the people. Why would the people want the government to fight a business that they could voluntarily avoid, without any government…
I wonder if it could be possible to mix test samples to test several people at once? Like maybe take 10 or even 100 samples, mix them together, and the test shows positive if any of the 100 has the disease? In that…