Yes, agree. There should be range. Similar precision appears in other exposure studies also. E.g. This one was trending from OpenAI and Wharton a short while back: arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10130
You should read the paper (or at least the abstract) before making personal attacks. It makes no claims about job disruption (quite the opposite actually).
Yes, agree. There should be range. Similar precision appears in other exposure studies also. E.g. This one was trending from OpenAI and Wharton a short while back: arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10130
You should read the paper (or at least the abstract) before making personal attacks. It makes no claims about job disruption (quite the opposite actually).