Step 1 "Understand the available information" is apparently a hard step. (I too have been incredulous that this remains an open issue; if this gets it fixed, bring on the boris blog posts!)
It's clearest in the conclusion.
dotcoma's comment however, claimed "no NSA etc". While it's not pertinent to this article, I think pointing out spurious claims (which people might be believing and acting on) has value regardless.
It wasn't sufficient data. OP was describing their foolish attitude at the time.
Step 1 "Understand the available information" is apparently a hard step. (I too have been incredulous that this remains an open issue; if this gets it fixed, bring on the boris blog posts!)
It's clearest in the conclusion.
dotcoma's comment however, claimed "no NSA etc". While it's not pertinent to this article, I think pointing out spurious claims (which people might be believing and acting on) has value regardless.
It wasn't sufficient data. OP was describing their foolish attitude at the time.