It's clearest in the conclusion.
dotcoma's comment however, claimed "no NSA etc". While it's not pertinent to this article, I think pointing out spurious claims (which people might be believing and acting on) has value regardless.
It wasn't sufficient data. OP was describing their foolish attitude at the time.
It's clearest in the conclusion.
dotcoma's comment however, claimed "no NSA etc". While it's not pertinent to this article, I think pointing out spurious claims (which people might be believing and acting on) has value regardless.
It wasn't sufficient data. OP was describing their foolish attitude at the time.