> "Ordinary paid work" that pays less than a dollar an hour. This is why I'm saying that this work should be paid with fair rates. I think you've made a lot of false assumptions about myself, about who I am and about my…
> I'm not seeing anything unfair here Yeah, because feeding and housing drug dealers for the money taken forcibly from an average Joe who works 12h a day to provide to his family is totally fair. > the society pays…
>if you feel that letting people starve to death is a viable alternative (as you did in your earlier comment) isn't it how this works in principle for folks that are not imprisoned? (And no, I don't think this a viable…
No, I'm not jealous - there is no need for personal remarks here. I'm just pointing out that it's not fair to the rest of the society. State will only be able to feed and house inmates, if it forcibly takes money from…
> That depends on the situation but is ultimately un-important It actually is very important because this is exactly what distinguishes between labour slavery and ordinary paid work. Economic rules is not something that…
Not really. The basic rule of economics is that you have to give something in order to get something. Inmates should be given a choice of working and making money so they can pay for their living or do nothing and…
> should be the total of their debt to society I call it BS. Why should ordinary people work and pay for criminals?
> "Ordinary paid work" that pays less than a dollar an hour. This is why I'm saying that this work should be paid with fair rates. I think you've made a lot of false assumptions about myself, about who I am and about my…
> "Ordinary paid work" that pays less than a dollar an hour. This is why I'm saying that this work should be paid with fair rates. I think you've made a lot of false assumptions about myself, about who I am and about my…
> I'm not seeing anything unfair here Yeah, because feeding and housing drug dealers for the money taken forcibly from an average Joe who works 12h a day to provide to his family is totally fair. > the society pays…
>if you feel that letting people starve to death is a viable alternative (as you did in your earlier comment) isn't it how this works in principle for folks that are not imprisoned? (And no, I don't think this a viable…
No, I'm not jealous - there is no need for personal remarks here. I'm just pointing out that it's not fair to the rest of the society. State will only be able to feed and house inmates, if it forcibly takes money from…
> That depends on the situation but is ultimately un-important It actually is very important because this is exactly what distinguishes between labour slavery and ordinary paid work. Economic rules is not something that…
Not really. The basic rule of economics is that you have to give something in order to get something. Inmates should be given a choice of working and making money so they can pay for their living or do nothing and…
> should be the total of their debt to society I call it BS. Why should ordinary people work and pay for criminals?