I like the fact that PMs are showing what they think for a product end-state rather than talking about it. One of our PMs showed a fully functional code for what we need to build. Problem? it is good on a sandbox,…
Sounds like bad English translation. There are several other lines that does not make sense.
First part of your comment is true. NATO is irrelevant, but also they contribute to it more than most: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm
I like the fact that PMs are showing what they think for a product end-state rather than talking about it. One of our PMs showed a fully functional code for what we need to build. Problem? it is good on a sandbox,…
Sounds like bad English translation. There are several other lines that does not make sense.
First part of your comment is true. NATO is irrelevant, but also they contribute to it more than most: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm