Yep, you’re right. I was mixing it up with Groom of the Stool.
I just checked and you’re right! I’m mixing it up with Groom of the Stool, which was a separate but also honourable position.
Not to mention the Privy Council, so named because they were trusted to speak to the King while he was on the toilet! I don’t think the modern day Privy Council ever met with Elizabeth II in such a way!
I do think it’s fair to point out that both of these postage Matilda by a few hundred years. I’m actually struggling to think of many Christian European kingdoms that would have at this point. France only had kings at…
The substance of your objection is “these criticisms are regularly levelled at men today,” and you skip the part that 900 years have passed since they were levelled at Matilda. You then demand the article provide…
So there were some texts later discussing the problems of Elizabeth I being Queen Regnant when all laws and customs referred to a “King.” We also see a lot of her father’s behaviour (Henry VIII) being driven by his need…
Er… no it didn’t? It just said the criticism being based on her womanhood was evident because of <reason>, it never promised to prove it, it was just a rhetorical device and they expect the reader to know the…
I’m struggling to follow your point. The article isn’t giving a major thesis on why medieval people thought Matilda couldn’t rule England. From the perspective of the barons at the time, Matilda couldn’t be queen in her…
More importantly: a king was expected to embody the traits a queen was hammered for.
Let me get this straight, your contentions are: - Bush invaded Iraq because an oil company funded his campaign? - Obama bailed out banks (a thing every government worldwide was doing) because banks funded his campaign?…
That’s not an answer to the question. How did any of these presidents profit, financially or not, from their actions regarding Iraq or the 2008 financial crisis? What was the quid pro quo they received?
No, they’re not examples of corruption. Did Bush or Biden seek to profit from their actions financially? Not that I know of, unless you have proof showing what and how.
I explained: they’re all doing different things, they have different behaviours, they have different performance and uptime characteristics. The reason that the values change are completely different, so how that…
One way I’ve thought of it is to ask what happens if the function is blocked, how is it enabled mechanically and why would that be changed? Once you answer these, you start to see the groupings more clearly, I’ve found.
I 100% agree with everything you said and more. I spent a significant amount of time at my job arguing constantly with the entire engineering department that “Feature Flags” are not all the same thing and had to push…
I’m not here to defend credit agencies but I will point out that the GDPR does put the onus on them to make sure the information is accurate. This is a net positive. The power to delete your data with them would…
> If that's right than handling a GDPR data request 100% according to the rules would require having some way to search nearly every computer we've got looking for anything concerning any particular customer. You’re…
> So first you tell me to blindly trust officals, now i should leave country! Great advice! Again, context. I’m bored of explaining it to you like a toddler so I’ll just tell you to reread my comments very slowly and…
> You said "shady shit"! Look, I don’t think English is your first language, so I’m trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it’s getting really tiring having to explain basic things like “context” to you. I’m…
> just because I have small profits, does not mean i sell drugs! I never said anything about drugs. I’m talking about doing illegal things with people’s data. > And than you get different offical, with different…
While you might hate them, you don’t want your data to be removed from their systems. If you’re having a hard time accessing credit with them, imagine what happens when you try to access credit as a ghost.
By “major player” I meant the analytics companies that you pay, not you. > Yet more extra work! If “customer asks me to update my records on them, so I do it,” is too much work then you really shouldn’t be in the…
> GDPR is easy to implement once, but it is constantly changing every year. No it’s not. If you’re running an online store, compliance is pretty straightforward. Most of the PII you collect has a good reason: payment,…
As someone who worked on GDPR compliance just last year, in a company that is deeply affected by it, no, it’s not that complicated.
As someone who, until recently, worked in a company heavily impacted by GDPR, it’s a good thing. It forced the mindset away from “just do whatever is easiest,” to considering how it affects where our customer’s data is…
Yep, you’re right. I was mixing it up with Groom of the Stool.
I just checked and you’re right! I’m mixing it up with Groom of the Stool, which was a separate but also honourable position.
Not to mention the Privy Council, so named because they were trusted to speak to the King while he was on the toilet! I don’t think the modern day Privy Council ever met with Elizabeth II in such a way!
I do think it’s fair to point out that both of these postage Matilda by a few hundred years. I’m actually struggling to think of many Christian European kingdoms that would have at this point. France only had kings at…
The substance of your objection is “these criticisms are regularly levelled at men today,” and you skip the part that 900 years have passed since they were levelled at Matilda. You then demand the article provide…
So there were some texts later discussing the problems of Elizabeth I being Queen Regnant when all laws and customs referred to a “King.” We also see a lot of her father’s behaviour (Henry VIII) being driven by his need…
Er… no it didn’t? It just said the criticism being based on her womanhood was evident because of <reason>, it never promised to prove it, it was just a rhetorical device and they expect the reader to know the…
I’m struggling to follow your point. The article isn’t giving a major thesis on why medieval people thought Matilda couldn’t rule England. From the perspective of the barons at the time, Matilda couldn’t be queen in her…
More importantly: a king was expected to embody the traits a queen was hammered for.
Let me get this straight, your contentions are: - Bush invaded Iraq because an oil company funded his campaign? - Obama bailed out banks (a thing every government worldwide was doing) because banks funded his campaign?…
That’s not an answer to the question. How did any of these presidents profit, financially or not, from their actions regarding Iraq or the 2008 financial crisis? What was the quid pro quo they received?
No, they’re not examples of corruption. Did Bush or Biden seek to profit from their actions financially? Not that I know of, unless you have proof showing what and how.
I explained: they’re all doing different things, they have different behaviours, they have different performance and uptime characteristics. The reason that the values change are completely different, so how that…
One way I’ve thought of it is to ask what happens if the function is blocked, how is it enabled mechanically and why would that be changed? Once you answer these, you start to see the groupings more clearly, I’ve found.
I 100% agree with everything you said and more. I spent a significant amount of time at my job arguing constantly with the entire engineering department that “Feature Flags” are not all the same thing and had to push…
I’m not here to defend credit agencies but I will point out that the GDPR does put the onus on them to make sure the information is accurate. This is a net positive. The power to delete your data with them would…
> If that's right than handling a GDPR data request 100% according to the rules would require having some way to search nearly every computer we've got looking for anything concerning any particular customer. You’re…
> So first you tell me to blindly trust officals, now i should leave country! Great advice! Again, context. I’m bored of explaining it to you like a toddler so I’ll just tell you to reread my comments very slowly and…
> You said "shady shit"! Look, I don’t think English is your first language, so I’m trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it’s getting really tiring having to explain basic things like “context” to you. I’m…
> just because I have small profits, does not mean i sell drugs! I never said anything about drugs. I’m talking about doing illegal things with people’s data. > And than you get different offical, with different…
While you might hate them, you don’t want your data to be removed from their systems. If you’re having a hard time accessing credit with them, imagine what happens when you try to access credit as a ghost.
By “major player” I meant the analytics companies that you pay, not you. > Yet more extra work! If “customer asks me to update my records on them, so I do it,” is too much work then you really shouldn’t be in the…
> GDPR is easy to implement once, but it is constantly changing every year. No it’s not. If you’re running an online store, compliance is pretty straightforward. Most of the PII you collect has a good reason: payment,…
As someone who worked on GDPR compliance just last year, in a company that is deeply affected by it, no, it’s not that complicated.
As someone who, until recently, worked in a company heavily impacted by GDPR, it’s a good thing. It forced the mindset away from “just do whatever is easiest,” to considering how it affects where our customer’s data is…