True though I suspect it being, essentially, the first instance of it happening meant developers were playing catchup until it became the norm.
You said “they’re similar” and I’m refuting that by pointing out that they operate very differently. One is a retailer and one is a developer/publisher. Their operating models are different, so you can’t point at two…
You’re mostly correct but there’s truth to the original statement. Back in the PlayStation/N64 through to PS3/Xbox 360, consoles were so different to each other and PCs that porting games was a major task that resulted…
No, they’re not even remotely the same. The retailer keeps 30% of the retail price and, out of that, they pay for the upkeep of the store. It’s not 30% pure profit, it’s not even gross profit given they need to pay the…
You’re confusing 2 different things. Microsoft isn’t demanding a “cut,” it’s demanding its business units achieve a 30% profit margin on its investment. I think industry standard is closer to 10% once you factor in…
And the article says it won’t be automatically installed, so it’s only there for people that want it.
Once you’ve installed uv, adding ruff and ty is trivial. Installing uv is the only hoop you need to jump.
It does need to be paired with investment in train infrastructure, usually led by governments. Obviously, that would be a very good thing, just pointing it out!
Because that’s also not desirable all the time either. There are lots of one make series out there but they can be pretty mixed in how fun they are to watch. I was at Croft a few weeks ago and the BTCC rounds were…
The customer CEO never watched that presentation.
That’s exactly what they’re doing to reduce fuel usage by up to 6%.
Yep, you’re right. I was mixing it up with Groom of the Stool.
I just checked and you’re right! I’m mixing it up with Groom of the Stool, which was a separate but also honourable position.
Not to mention the Privy Council, so named because they were trusted to speak to the King while he was on the toilet! I don’t think the modern day Privy Council ever met with Elizabeth II in such a way!
I do think it’s fair to point out that both of these postage Matilda by a few hundred years. I’m actually struggling to think of many Christian European kingdoms that would have at this point. France only had kings at…
The substance of your objection is “these criticisms are regularly levelled at men today,” and you skip the part that 900 years have passed since they were levelled at Matilda. You then demand the article provide…
So there were some texts later discussing the problems of Elizabeth I being Queen Regnant when all laws and customs referred to a “King.” We also see a lot of her father’s behaviour (Henry VIII) being driven by his need…
Er… no it didn’t? It just said the criticism being based on her womanhood was evident because of <reason>, it never promised to prove it, it was just a rhetorical device and they expect the reader to know the…
I’m struggling to follow your point. The article isn’t giving a major thesis on why medieval people thought Matilda couldn’t rule England. From the perspective of the barons at the time, Matilda couldn’t be queen in her…
More importantly: a king was expected to embody the traits a queen was hammered for.
Let me get this straight, your contentions are: - Bush invaded Iraq because an oil company funded his campaign? - Obama bailed out banks (a thing every government worldwide was doing) because banks funded his campaign?…
That’s not an answer to the question. How did any of these presidents profit, financially or not, from their actions regarding Iraq or the 2008 financial crisis? What was the quid pro quo they received?
No, they’re not examples of corruption. Did Bush or Biden seek to profit from their actions financially? Not that I know of, unless you have proof showing what and how.
I explained: they’re all doing different things, they have different behaviours, they have different performance and uptime characteristics. The reason that the values change are completely different, so how that…
One way I’ve thought of it is to ask what happens if the function is blocked, how is it enabled mechanically and why would that be changed? Once you answer these, you start to see the groupings more clearly, I’ve found.
True though I suspect it being, essentially, the first instance of it happening meant developers were playing catchup until it became the norm.
You said “they’re similar” and I’m refuting that by pointing out that they operate very differently. One is a retailer and one is a developer/publisher. Their operating models are different, so you can’t point at two…
You’re mostly correct but there’s truth to the original statement. Back in the PlayStation/N64 through to PS3/Xbox 360, consoles were so different to each other and PCs that porting games was a major task that resulted…
No, they’re not even remotely the same. The retailer keeps 30% of the retail price and, out of that, they pay for the upkeep of the store. It’s not 30% pure profit, it’s not even gross profit given they need to pay the…
You’re confusing 2 different things. Microsoft isn’t demanding a “cut,” it’s demanding its business units achieve a 30% profit margin on its investment. I think industry standard is closer to 10% once you factor in…
And the article says it won’t be automatically installed, so it’s only there for people that want it.
Once you’ve installed uv, adding ruff and ty is trivial. Installing uv is the only hoop you need to jump.
It does need to be paired with investment in train infrastructure, usually led by governments. Obviously, that would be a very good thing, just pointing it out!
Because that’s also not desirable all the time either. There are lots of one make series out there but they can be pretty mixed in how fun they are to watch. I was at Croft a few weeks ago and the BTCC rounds were…
The customer CEO never watched that presentation.
That’s exactly what they’re doing to reduce fuel usage by up to 6%.
Yep, you’re right. I was mixing it up with Groom of the Stool.
I just checked and you’re right! I’m mixing it up with Groom of the Stool, which was a separate but also honourable position.
Not to mention the Privy Council, so named because they were trusted to speak to the King while he was on the toilet! I don’t think the modern day Privy Council ever met with Elizabeth II in such a way!
I do think it’s fair to point out that both of these postage Matilda by a few hundred years. I’m actually struggling to think of many Christian European kingdoms that would have at this point. France only had kings at…
The substance of your objection is “these criticisms are regularly levelled at men today,” and you skip the part that 900 years have passed since they were levelled at Matilda. You then demand the article provide…
So there were some texts later discussing the problems of Elizabeth I being Queen Regnant when all laws and customs referred to a “King.” We also see a lot of her father’s behaviour (Henry VIII) being driven by his need…
Er… no it didn’t? It just said the criticism being based on her womanhood was evident because of <reason>, it never promised to prove it, it was just a rhetorical device and they expect the reader to know the…
I’m struggling to follow your point. The article isn’t giving a major thesis on why medieval people thought Matilda couldn’t rule England. From the perspective of the barons at the time, Matilda couldn’t be queen in her…
More importantly: a king was expected to embody the traits a queen was hammered for.
Let me get this straight, your contentions are: - Bush invaded Iraq because an oil company funded his campaign? - Obama bailed out banks (a thing every government worldwide was doing) because banks funded his campaign?…
That’s not an answer to the question. How did any of these presidents profit, financially or not, from their actions regarding Iraq or the 2008 financial crisis? What was the quid pro quo they received?
No, they’re not examples of corruption. Did Bush or Biden seek to profit from their actions financially? Not that I know of, unless you have proof showing what and how.
I explained: they’re all doing different things, they have different behaviours, they have different performance and uptime characteristics. The reason that the values change are completely different, so how that…
One way I’ve thought of it is to ask what happens if the function is blocked, how is it enabled mechanically and why would that be changed? Once you answer these, you start to see the groupings more clearly, I’ve found.