Like the other poster said. You're free to make your game using AI, and I'm free to not use it, discourage others from using it and boycotting and protesting you for creating it.
Yep true. But I've learned to stop worrying about it long ago. A corporation's gonna corpo. Best we can do is avoid using their services and work on better open source alternatives.
Most modern AI models carry watermarks embedded in images and text, so they can know if something is AI or not. These are probably detected and discarded from the training set.
You have to remember that Google is first and foremost a data company. I don't want to sound conspiratorial but every misclick or misunderstood permission window does give Google more data which means more money.
I think games like art should be one of the few areas that aren't developed by AI, because human expression is the point. I mean code, reports and other stuff, those have utility outside of the creation process itself…
Like the other poster said. You're free to make your game using AI, and I'm free to not use it, discourage others from using it and boycotting and protesting you for creating it.
Yep true. But I've learned to stop worrying about it long ago. A corporation's gonna corpo. Best we can do is avoid using their services and work on better open source alternatives.
Most modern AI models carry watermarks embedded in images and text, so they can know if something is AI or not. These are probably detected and discarded from the training set.
You have to remember that Google is first and foremost a data company. I don't want to sound conspiratorial but every misclick or misunderstood permission window does give Google more data which means more money.
I think games like art should be one of the few areas that aren't developed by AI, because human expression is the point. I mean code, reports and other stuff, those have utility outside of the creation process itself…