So what you're saying is that 1 BTC = 1 BTC?
"Technical Debt is most of the time used as a negative connotation, but it doesn't need to be like that all the time. It's like taking a loan. It will allow you to deliver software faster in adverse circumstances…
NSFW warning please. I read HN at work
Thoughts on trying to sell back to the company?
Crypto is a volatile market. It goes up and it goes down.
"Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said “bitcoin is successful only because of its potential for circumvention, lack of oversight." - this statement demonstrates a profound ignorance of the subject matter.…
You missed the entire point of Bitcoin - allowing individuals to transact securely across distances without the need for a third party. The blockchain (the entire network) secures the transactions.
This guy is an idiot who also doesn't understand bitcoin and shouldn't be taken seriously.
Yep, just saying that if he's not malicious (intending to maximize harm to users), then he's an idiot for disclosing it this way.
This is the most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time. Yes, they were already at risk, but with the way he disclosed the information, the risk increased exponentially. This guy's actions were either stupid or…
Nah
So what you're saying is that 1 BTC = 1 BTC?
"Technical Debt is most of the time used as a negative connotation, but it doesn't need to be like that all the time. It's like taking a loan. It will allow you to deliver software faster in adverse circumstances…
NSFW warning please. I read HN at work
Thoughts on trying to sell back to the company?
Crypto is a volatile market. It goes up and it goes down.
"Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said “bitcoin is successful only because of its potential for circumvention, lack of oversight." - this statement demonstrates a profound ignorance of the subject matter.…
You missed the entire point of Bitcoin - allowing individuals to transact securely across distances without the need for a third party. The blockchain (the entire network) secures the transactions.
This guy is an idiot who also doesn't understand bitcoin and shouldn't be taken seriously.
Yep, just saying that if he's not malicious (intending to maximize harm to users), then he's an idiot for disclosing it this way.
This is the most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time. Yes, they were already at risk, but with the way he disclosed the information, the risk increased exponentially. This guy's actions were either stupid or…
Nah