sebasmannem
No user record in our sample, but sebasmannem has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but sebasmannem has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Yeah, and let Postgres take care of redundancy. I agree that this is an interesting proposition. AFAIK PortWorkx could do a similar thing, but then with storage redundancy. Basically: - storage is synced to 3 local…
I also only run short term. I enable customers with designing and implementing the proper (CEPH e.a.) environment for their workloads. But I don't run their systems. I always handover to the rest of the technical staff.…
I both agree and don't agree about your comments. Benchmarks should be a comparison and one can very well do a comparison between exactly same deployment on exactly same infrastructure with 2 different storage types…
We have run benchmarks on our environment (CNPG, Openshift and CEPH in Dutch gov) and compared to Azure Postgres and (CNPG on) Azure AKS. Pgbench and pg_tps_optimizer. CEPH indeed is a 'high bandwidth / high latency'…