Ah well. It looks like I'm just invisible to you then. Sorry for bothering. Good luck with the blog
O hey, just found the heap profiling runs. As you can see, the C++ version uses much less memory (also the C version by the OP uses 73MB - whoa; The OCaml#3 might report 12MB, but the C++ version clocks in at just 12KB.…
I can't say I'm impressed here. In the process of being all self righteous and morally outraged, you have killed the comments contributed by your audience. It strikes me as odd that I kept coming back to your blog,…
What's the password doing on their server? Also, why is there no salt in the comparison. It calls a naked crypt, that whole ... interesting ... hash() function is sitting there unused. I have serious doubts whether this…
I agree. In manner of response to the very agitated repliers: I'm not saying that sharing fault is something to be ashamed of. I'm not also morally condemning my parents for lying to me, keeping me away from nice things…
Yup. But he doesn't know it!
Ah well. It looks like I'm just invisible to you then. Sorry for bothering. Good luck with the blog
O hey, just found the heap profiling runs. As you can see, the C++ version uses much less memory (also the C version by the OP uses 73MB - whoa; The OCaml#3 might report 12MB, but the C++ version clocks in at just 12KB.…
I can't say I'm impressed here. In the process of being all self righteous and morally outraged, you have killed the comments contributed by your audience. It strikes me as odd that I kept coming back to your blog,…
What's the password doing on their server? Also, why is there no salt in the comparison. It calls a naked crypt, that whole ... interesting ... hash() function is sitting there unused. I have serious doubts whether this…
I agree. In manner of response to the very agitated repliers: I'm not saying that sharing fault is something to be ashamed of. I'm not also morally condemning my parents for lying to me, keeping me away from nice things…
Yup. But he doesn't know it!