Suggesting COVID-19 science is "bad science" will lead to people dying. You are condoning murder.
It is really irresponsible and dangerous to post this sort of thing on HN, and dang should be ashamed to leave it up so long. Junk articles like this do nothing but sow public distrust in an extremely trustworthy…
Statistics tip: if you're shilling for an insufficiently tested drug, don't show the 95% confidence intervals.
So because one bad thing exists we're not allowed to be worried about another bad thing?
Allergic reactions to adjuvants is an entirely different matter (than autoimmune reactions) and may actually not apply to these vaccines. This just goes to show, don't get your medical advice from HN.
> as the mRNA is not reverse transcribed into DNA and reintegrated into the genome Why not? Just because it doesn't match up, or is there a deeper reason?
> specifically wondering about the chance for an MRNA vaccine triggering or deepening autoimmune disease. I think the medical guidance has been pretty clear that you should not get the vaccine in this case. There are a…
I know it's not the answer you're hoping for, but some people have medical issues which make taking any kind of vaccine too dangerous.
> Nevertheless, that incomprehensibly huge number is still an exact figure whose magnitude, according to Aaronson, represents “a statement about our current knowledge” of number theory. This is, of course, contradicted…
Don't worry, the decision will be made for her by governments and/or venues banning the unvaccinated from public places. All will be well again!
Suggesting COVID-19 science is "bad science" will lead to people dying. You are condoning murder.
It is really irresponsible and dangerous to post this sort of thing on HN, and dang should be ashamed to leave it up so long. Junk articles like this do nothing but sow public distrust in an extremely trustworthy…
Statistics tip: if you're shilling for an insufficiently tested drug, don't show the 95% confidence intervals.
So because one bad thing exists we're not allowed to be worried about another bad thing?
Allergic reactions to adjuvants is an entirely different matter (than autoimmune reactions) and may actually not apply to these vaccines. This just goes to show, don't get your medical advice from HN.
> as the mRNA is not reverse transcribed into DNA and reintegrated into the genome Why not? Just because it doesn't match up, or is there a deeper reason?
> specifically wondering about the chance for an MRNA vaccine triggering or deepening autoimmune disease. I think the medical guidance has been pretty clear that you should not get the vaccine in this case. There are a…
I know it's not the answer you're hoping for, but some people have medical issues which make taking any kind of vaccine too dangerous.
> Nevertheless, that incomprehensibly huge number is still an exact figure whose magnitude, according to Aaronson, represents “a statement about our current knowledge” of number theory. This is, of course, contradicted…
Don't worry, the decision will be made for her by governments and/or venues banning the unvaccinated from public places. All will be well again!