That makes sense. It's probably less "doing crazy convolution calculations on how sampled ambient noise changes as the helicopter gets close to a pole", and more "rotten wood vibrates slower"
[dead]
That's very progressive of you and all, but the vast majority of South Korea's military is men doing their mandatory service when they come of age, so it is very much relevant to call out the gender
This is currently a huge source of inefficiency in modern chip design. I've worked on some of the current highest profile chip projects doing "frontend" RTL design, and at every major chip company I've worked at, and…
It's far more reasonable to assume it moves infinitely fast between peasants, but comes to a halt at each one. Or if not infinitely fast, but we're going to assume a chain could accelerate it indefinitely, than it's…
Well yeah, this is just supposed to be a paradox where you break down the flaw in the way the problem is presented. Recognizing that there is a flaw isn't the point.
That does not track. If you believed Bitcoin was under valued, you would just buy Bitcoin and not pay a 100% premium to buy shares in their company. Also being inflationary is a feature of the US dollar, not a downside.…
Let's not pretend this stuff actually works
That makes sense. It's probably less "doing crazy convolution calculations on how sampled ambient noise changes as the helicopter gets close to a pole", and more "rotten wood vibrates slower"
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
That's very progressive of you and all, but the vast majority of South Korea's military is men doing their mandatory service when they come of age, so it is very much relevant to call out the gender
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
This is currently a huge source of inefficiency in modern chip design. I've worked on some of the current highest profile chip projects doing "frontend" RTL design, and at every major chip company I've worked at, and…
It's far more reasonable to assume it moves infinitely fast between peasants, but comes to a halt at each one. Or if not infinitely fast, but we're going to assume a chain could accelerate it indefinitely, than it's…
Well yeah, this is just supposed to be a paradox where you break down the flaw in the way the problem is presented. Recognizing that there is a flaw isn't the point.
That does not track. If you believed Bitcoin was under valued, you would just buy Bitcoin and not pay a 100% premium to buy shares in their company. Also being inflationary is a feature of the US dollar, not a downside.…
Let's not pretend this stuff actually works
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]