This will go the way of many of the other articles highlighting the overcorrection of “gender fairness” and will be off the front page by tomorrow (figuratively. Literally, it will never even make it there) . Shame…
This scares me because this looks like it would be a pretty common edge case/ something you would easily think of. How could a bug like that in such a high stakes scenario not be tested/be missed??
This will go the way of many of the other articles highlighting the overcorrection of “gender fairness” and will be off the front page by tomorrow (figuratively. Literally, it will never even make it there) . Shame…
This scares me because this looks like it would be a pretty common edge case/ something you would easily think of. How could a bug like that in such a high stakes scenario not be tested/be missed??