> More likely, the Incan slave/poor populace was split and easily co-opted by the Spaniards. Why is this either/or? The above statement is undoubtedly true, but that doesn't mean what I said is false. The problem, is,…
"Incan society" is a bit of a misnomer. "Inca" refers to either the ethnic group, or the ruler of the empire (so "Manco Inca" is roughly "King Inca"). About 100 years before contact with the Spanish, the Inca defeated…
> More likely, the Incan slave/poor populace was split and easily co-opted by the Spaniards. Why is this either/or? The above statement is undoubtedly true, but that doesn't mean what I said is false. The problem, is,…
"Incan society" is a bit of a misnomer. "Inca" refers to either the ethnic group, or the ruler of the empire (so "Manco Inca" is roughly "King Inca"). About 100 years before contact with the Spanish, the Inca defeated…