Would you also add other type-related aspects into variable names? `firstNameString`, `ratioFloat`, `colorEnum`? These things should be types, not easy-to-ignore type-encodings into variable names..
90% would be more accurate.
And it will for all future make it impossible for you to distinguish official API and implementation details.
Would you also add other type-related aspects into variable names? `firstNameString`, `ratioFloat`, `colorEnum`? These things should be types, not easy-to-ignore type-encodings into variable names..
90% would be more accurate.
And it will for all future make it impossible for you to distinguish official API and implementation details.