Yeah, I found this an important aspect of the article. I don't know anything about the culture at NPM, but this feels related to the mismanagement of communication with consumers/the public about the incident itself.…
With a safe, as with any encrypted document, there are a finite number of keys. I think that invalidates the idea of possession of the password being important, at least from a "purely lawful" point of view. Read/write…
Wouldn't it be interesting if we were able to capture so much information in a photograph that you could examine the pupils of the people that appear in pupils, etc.?
Yeah, I found this an important aspect of the article. I don't know anything about the culture at NPM, but this feels related to the mismanagement of communication with consumers/the public about the incident itself.…
With a safe, as with any encrypted document, there are a finite number of keys. I think that invalidates the idea of possession of the password being important, at least from a "purely lawful" point of view. Read/write…
Wouldn't it be interesting if we were able to capture so much information in a photograph that you could examine the pupils of the people that appear in pupils, etc.?