It wouldn't be HN without classic "But America Bad!" whataboutism.
Sure, so how would you arrive at a dollar amount? What would it be?
How would you value this exploit, or any exploit?
Seriously. Folks in tech like to complain about MBAs, but it's a toss up in my book for "most egregiously overconfident". Doctors get a good shout as well.
Sent you an email
When I read comments like this I always wonder what the purpose is - what exactly do you want a reader to come away with? Companies did bad things until they decided it was no longer to their advantage, and stopped? And…
This is such a strange take it borders on satire. Could you elaborate on if you genuinely think this would resolve the issues the DPRK experiences?
Because HN is home to performative contrariness - making an observation for no substantive reason other than to show you "know" something.
This seems needlessly critical. If the fire department puts out a fire, it seems like most people would consider that a good use of resources. In this case, the comments seem irrationally critical, to the point of being…
Isn't that exactly what the fire department should be doing? I don't understand the criticism, could you explain why you view this in a negative light?
It wouldn't be HN without classic "But America Bad!" whataboutism.
Sure, so how would you arrive at a dollar amount? What would it be?
How would you value this exploit, or any exploit?
Seriously. Folks in tech like to complain about MBAs, but it's a toss up in my book for "most egregiously overconfident". Doctors get a good shout as well.
Sent you an email
When I read comments like this I always wonder what the purpose is - what exactly do you want a reader to come away with? Companies did bad things until they decided it was no longer to their advantage, and stopped? And…
This is such a strange take it borders on satire. Could you elaborate on if you genuinely think this would resolve the issues the DPRK experiences?
Because HN is home to performative contrariness - making an observation for no substantive reason other than to show you "know" something.
This seems needlessly critical. If the fire department puts out a fire, it seems like most people would consider that a good use of resources. In this case, the comments seem irrationally critical, to the point of being…
Isn't that exactly what the fire department should be doing? I don't understand the criticism, could you explain why you view this in a negative light?