this is my update from above, as i realized that was paul graham.... i mean: maybe they had to protect their sources? maybe they have the (naive?) idea that they only have to bring up "the truth" and "the truth" speaks…
how should they provide context? update: i mean: maybe they had to protect their sources? maybe they have the (naive?) idea that they only have to bring up "the truth" and "the truth" speaks for itself? for sure, there…
i sometimes browse this site: asknature.org it is often a very strange approach and cannot be replicated by humans, but i like the ideology.
this is my update from above, as i realized that was paul graham.... i mean: maybe they had to protect their sources? maybe they have the (naive?) idea that they only have to bring up "the truth" and "the truth" speaks…
how should they provide context? update: i mean: maybe they had to protect their sources? maybe they have the (naive?) idea that they only have to bring up "the truth" and "the truth" speaks for itself? for sure, there…
i sometimes browse this site: asknature.org it is often a very strange approach and cannot be replicated by humans, but i like the ideology.