I have seen that IPCC statement you quoted before and don't regard it as credible. Again, once again, over again, yet again, one more time, just from what I wrote, from either data or models, there is no credible…
Resolving at least what is in my post is much easier than working through the IPCC's reports: It's simple, really simple, just as in my post: Observational data: The main observational data used to argue the dangerous…
This post appears to be fully within the Hacker News "approach to comments" and "site guidelines". The atmospheric temperature discussed as dangerous has been common in many parts of the earth for many years and is not…
I have seen that IPCC statement you quoted before and don't regard it as credible. Again, once again, over again, yet again, one more time, just from what I wrote, from either data or models, there is no credible…
Resolving at least what is in my post is much easier than working through the IPCC's reports: It's simple, really simple, just as in my post: Observational data: The main observational data used to argue the dangerous…
This post appears to be fully within the Hacker News "approach to comments" and "site guidelines". The atmospheric temperature discussed as dangerous has been common in many parts of the earth for many years and is not…