You clearly don't care about the eco-damage or else you wouldn't be using Big Tech's LLMs lol. And let's not kid ourselves, you aren't programming anything. You are paying Anthropic to brute force the code for you with…
LLMs haven't enabled any discoveries that were previously out of reach. If you disagree, name one? >AI is useful today and is getting more powerful and efficient No, it's getting less efficient at an exponential rate…
I just don't understand how it can be fun to commission work from Big Tech
Yeah all the viral crap from LLMs are low quality rip offs of stuff that already exists. There is no innovation from what I've seen
The answer is no, at least so far. There's been a few big quantitative studies (CircleCI, a few others I can't remember) which show this - more code, more branches, more PRs, but actually less going to production. It's…
That's not even fully true - I can't draw but I can tell LLM 'art' looks like shit
You clearly don't care about the eco-damage or else you wouldn't be using Big Tech's LLMs lol. And let's not kid ourselves, you aren't programming anything. You are paying Anthropic to brute force the code for you with…
LLMs haven't enabled any discoveries that were previously out of reach. If you disagree, name one? >AI is useful today and is getting more powerful and efficient No, it's getting less efficient at an exponential rate…
I just don't understand how it can be fun to commission work from Big Tech
Yeah all the viral crap from LLMs are low quality rip offs of stuff that already exists. There is no innovation from what I've seen
The answer is no, at least so far. There's been a few big quantitative studies (CircleCI, a few others I can't remember) which show this - more code, more branches, more PRs, but actually less going to production. It's…
That's not even fully true - I can't draw but I can tell LLM 'art' looks like shit