So, you realized what's going on... why doesn't that filter down to the general population?
Wow, I didn't realize until now how sparsely populated Alberta is. Only 5 million people in a huge area and a little over 1m voters in this referendum. And some of them are worried about immigration?! Myanmar is a…
how is that partisan politics? showing up as a mascot for a random human interest story is the primary function of a mayor.
Unregulated markets always trend toward monopoly.
in the absence of regulation, people will do fraud. you need regulation.
If someone thinks that a human mind operates like a computer, they might think that humans are interchangeable with computers, and then decide that we are better off without humans.
About 70-75% of Americans live in single family homes. Your experience is not universal.
I hope we never do prove that, because as soon as that happens it will be used for eugenics.
tell that to the c-suite!
Hmm, that's poor API design. If the big companies can't standardize their inputs and responses, then the small projects aren't going to either. Sounds like there are lots of small issues like this that will roadblock…
well yeah, it works for those incumbent giants. but the whole point of a "moat" is that it makes it more difficult for everyone else to enter.
do you really want AI to make life and death decisions? do you really want that power concentrated in the hands of the few who own the AI systems?
what do you prefer to talk about?
Well, it's sad that the professor's advice for how to get a job today is "networking", same as it always was. I feel bad for those who don't have family or friends who work in the industry.
Does any company besides OpenAI get to misreport $20b in revenue and still get taken seriously?
In a sane world this power would not be allowed in the hands of private corporations.
It's on OpenAI and Anthropic to prove that they obtained these results legitimately and credited all researchers who deserve credit. They do not get the benefit of the doubt.
How do we know that these "internal models" are not just half computer and half a giant team of mathematicians? How do we know that OpenAI actually came up with these solutions and didn't steal them from outside…
But then we have to as well ={
How do you get that through to someone who doesn't even understand that mass surveillance and profiling is a problem? Or to young people who have only lived in a society of mass surveillance?
What's stopping someone from paying to influence AI results?
Well they were a people, who came from somewhere! Are you really saying that these battles didn't happen?
But I bet he would rant about immigrants who don't affect him at all.
Okay then, who did the Egyptians fight during the Battle of the Delta during the reign of Ramesses III?
The US has materially supported terrorist groups in the Middle East and South America.
So, you realized what's going on... why doesn't that filter down to the general population?
Wow, I didn't realize until now how sparsely populated Alberta is. Only 5 million people in a huge area and a little over 1m voters in this referendum. And some of them are worried about immigration?! Myanmar is a…
how is that partisan politics? showing up as a mascot for a random human interest story is the primary function of a mayor.
Unregulated markets always trend toward monopoly.
in the absence of regulation, people will do fraud. you need regulation.
If someone thinks that a human mind operates like a computer, they might think that humans are interchangeable with computers, and then decide that we are better off without humans.
About 70-75% of Americans live in single family homes. Your experience is not universal.
I hope we never do prove that, because as soon as that happens it will be used for eugenics.
tell that to the c-suite!
Hmm, that's poor API design. If the big companies can't standardize their inputs and responses, then the small projects aren't going to either. Sounds like there are lots of small issues like this that will roadblock…
well yeah, it works for those incumbent giants. but the whole point of a "moat" is that it makes it more difficult for everyone else to enter.
do you really want AI to make life and death decisions? do you really want that power concentrated in the hands of the few who own the AI systems?
what do you prefer to talk about?
Well, it's sad that the professor's advice for how to get a job today is "networking", same as it always was. I feel bad for those who don't have family or friends who work in the industry.
Does any company besides OpenAI get to misreport $20b in revenue and still get taken seriously?
In a sane world this power would not be allowed in the hands of private corporations.
It's on OpenAI and Anthropic to prove that they obtained these results legitimately and credited all researchers who deserve credit. They do not get the benefit of the doubt.
How do we know that these "internal models" are not just half computer and half a giant team of mathematicians? How do we know that OpenAI actually came up with these solutions and didn't steal them from outside…
But then we have to as well ={
How do you get that through to someone who doesn't even understand that mass surveillance and profiling is a problem? Or to young people who have only lived in a society of mass surveillance?
What's stopping someone from paying to influence AI results?
Well they were a people, who came from somewhere! Are you really saying that these battles didn't happen?
But I bet he would rant about immigrants who don't affect him at all.
Okay then, who did the Egyptians fight during the Battle of the Delta during the reign of Ramesses III?
The US has materially supported terrorist groups in the Middle East and South America.